Venue: Microsoft Teams / Hybrid Council Chamber
Contact: Alison Thomas Email: firstname.lastname@example.org
relation to the Care Inspectorate Wales Inspection of Trem
Y Mor Respite Unit report, Members wanted to
congratulate Officers for an excellent report.
the Social Services Complaints and Representations Annual Report 2021-22,
Members wanted to congratulate officers for a brilliant report and said how it
was nice to see that there more compliments than complaints.
Declarations of Interest
The following Member made a
declaration of interest at the start of the meeting:
Councillor Charlotte Galsworthy Re: Items 7 – Audit Wales Report on Direct Payments for Adult
Social Care as she is a Personal Assistant (PA) for her mother.
Cllr Sian Harris Re:
Items 13 – The Procurement of a Social Care Case Management Platform – Her son
is a PCSO.
Cllr Jeff Jones Re:
Cllr Jones’ wife works for the Wellbeing Team
Cllr A.Lockyer Re: Items 7 –
Audit Wales Report on Direct Payments for Adult Social Care – His daughter is a
updated members in relation to the Budget.
asked how much percentage of the reserve fund was expected to be allocated to
explained that none of the funds were specifically for the Social Services directorate,
it would be used to underwrite the whole council budget for next year.
updated members in relation to Asylum and Refugees Resettlement.
asked who was funding the British Red Cross. Officers explained the British Red
Cross were commissioned to provide very specific orientation support to Afghan
families and that was funded by at a tariff from the Home Office.
referred to the company Clear Springs and it referred to three properties for
family accommodation, members asked officers if the property was in addition to
the three properties already in place. Officers explained that the three Afghan
families had arrived and were a refugee resettlements program, which was
entirely different to the asylum dispersal route. Asylum seekers and refugees
had a different legal definition. Clear Springs had been contracted by the Home
Office to source initial accommodation for Asylum Seekers. Officers had no
details on what the nationalities could be and wouldn’t know until the property
asked in relation to the host family visa scheme, what would happen if the
relationship between the Ukrainian family and the host family doesn’t go very
well after a few weeks or a couple of months, would the local authority
intervene. Officers explained under the Ukrainian settlements program, the
people arrive in with their visas either through the homes for Ukraine or the
family visa scheme had all the rights to housing, education and benefits so, if
the relationship broke down they could present to the housing options service
who would have to provide advice or temporary accommodation.
mentioned the report briefly explains about the unaccompanied Asylum Seeking
Children and issues they had with the dispersal mechanism from the Home Office.
While Officers had worked well with Welsh Government, the relationship wasn’t
as strong with the Home Office where officers had to write to the Home Office
that there were safeguarding issues and the way they were discharging their
responsibilities. Officers suggested that the committee may want a further
report in relation to the Home Office. Members were happy with this suggestion.
asked in relation to Clear Springs, what input they had with regards to monitoring
the quality of accommodation that the company were allocating. Officers
explained under the Asylum Dispersal Route, Clear Springs had a process whereby
they consult the local authority on a prospective property that they hope to
procure, they would send the details to officers and then they consult with
colleagues across the local authority, which would include Education, Safeguarding,
Housing and Environmental Health. Officers also consult with South Wales
Police, the Health Board, Mid and West Wales Fire and Rescue Service to find
out their views also. The form would be required to be returned within five
days and within that form, officers could say whether they were supportive or
not supportive of the property being used.
Home Office and Clear Springs could challenge that and had already pushed back against
one property that was raised concerns about on behalf of South Wales Police.
Members asked for an update in relation to what the ... view the full minutes text for item 4.
delivered a presentation to the committee in relation to Anti-Social Behaviour
thanked Officers for an excellent presentation and thanked them for all their
asked would Welsh Government be offering more resources to help the area. Officers
explained they have had a number of grants, in relation to the housing support
grant there hadn’t been an uplift in that grant but was at a standstill position
of approximately 6.5 million to provide the support to people that needed
additional support to prevent homelessness or to support them back into accommodation.
Officers explained they had been given various grants for next year also but
the amount of grants doesn’t cover the cost of supporting people.
select appropriate items from the Cabinet Board agenda for Pre-Decision
Scrutiny (Cabinet Board reports included for Scrutiny Members)
Members agreed to scrutinise items 7, 12 and 13 from the Cabinet Board
Audit Wales Report
On Direct Payments For Adult Social Care
Members were presented with a report relating to the summary of the content of the Audit Wales on Direct Payments for Adults Social Care.
Members asked in relation recommendation three, it stated the advocacy services representatives to be invited to direct payment recipient form and meetings, members asked does it mean paid for advocacy or third sector advocates. Officers explained they had legal surgeries for direct payments where social workers were being updated and trained as they went along. Officers mentioned they want advocates more at the front door, they want the initial part of the assessment so that they were satisfied that people were being offered direct payments. The report was referring to a non-paid advocate for people to have somebody as part of their network that sits with social work in terms of them making sure the right people were with the individual during that assessment process. Officers mentioned that advocacy can include third sector or it can include the paid advocate or can include anyone that wishes to advocate on behalf of that person who could be the direct recipient.
Members queried the difference in payments between Neath Port Talbot and Swansea as Swansea is paid more. Officers explained they can’t recruit domiciliary care workers or home care workers in the Council for the money they were paying which is more than the £10.50 an hour. Officers added that they had a rate of pay for Personal Assistants but then other areas would set their rates for agency or respite, NPT wouldn’t do that but they made sure that people were able to put to Commission the service that they needed. Members asked for a further report to publicise all the positive work officers were undertaking.
Members noted the report.
Members asked for Items to be put on
the Forward Work Programme for the next couple of months:
Joint Working with Home Office
Report on Personal Assistants
Update on accommodation (Asylum and
urgent items (whether public or exempt) at the discretion of the Chairperson
pursuant to Section 100B (4) (b) of the Local Government Act 1972.
Access to Meetings
to Meetings to resolve to exclude the public for the following item(s) pursuant
to Section 100A(4) and (5) of the Local Government Act 1972 and the relevant
exempt paragraphs of Part 4 of Schedule 12A to the above Act.
Pre-Decision Scrutiny of Private Item/s
select appropriate private items from the Cabinet Board agenda for Pre-Decision
Scrutiny (Cabinet Board reports enclosed for Scrutiny Members)
On Hillside Secure Children's Home
Members were presented with a report in relation to the Mangers
Report on Hillside Secure Children’s Home
Members noted the report.
The Procurement Of
a Social Care Case Management Platform
Members were presented with a report in relation to the
Procurement of a Social Care Case Management Platform.
Following scrutiny, members were supportive of the
recommendations to be considered by the Cabinet Board