Minutes:
The
Committee scrutinised the following matters:
Cabinet
Board Proposals
7.1 The Children’s Home (Wales) Regulations
2002
The Committee received the monthly reports from the
Children’s Home (Wales) Regulations 2002 visits from November 2016 to February
2017, as detailed within the circulated report.
Members highlighted concerns that certain
information and logs were not available at the time of the visits, as this
issue had been raised before. Officers had noted this and explained that the
visits were unannounced and the logs were onsite
either at a centre meeting or being used by staff. It was explained that the
officer visiting had not requested the logs. Members were informed that
significant improvements had been made following these reports. The new
processes have ensured better access to information and the documentation for
officers had also improved. It was noted that risk assessments were now signed
off by team managers at weekly multidisciplinary meetings.
It was highlighted that there had been some
complaints about a pool table being removed from one of the Units. It was
explained that it had to be removed due to an incident. The tables were now
accessible but not in the main lounge area. It was highlighted that some of the
issues with bedrooms and bathroom facilities were being addressed through the
modernisation process. It was noted that there were ongoing problems with power
surges affecting the heating and hot water.
It was noted that it had been suggested that
sanctions should be more consistent and relatable to the behaviour. Officers
agreed that there was some need for improvement in consistency and staff
understanding the process.
It was highlighted that the changes to the staff
rota had been implemented and had resulted in significant improvements.
Staffing rotas were now comparatively better than other areas. Officers
explained that good progress had been made in developing the multidisciplinary
team, including mental health services and they were delivering positive
outcomes.
It was highlighted that since January 2016 there
had been a change in reporting officers, which had also improved reporting
arrangements and reports were received in a timelier manner. Members asked if
there were positive reinforcements to improve behaviours of young people.
Officers explained that there was an award system in place that ranged from
bronze to platinum level and the young people could gain different privileges
from moving up the levels. It was agreed that the scheme would be circulated to
the Committee for information. It was noted that the responses to behaviour was
tailored to the needs of the children and young people.
Members commented that there had been some positive
changes taking place in Hillside.
Following scrutiny, it was agreed that the report
be noted.
7.2 The Manager’s Report on Hillside Secure
Children’s Home
The Committee received the Managers Report on
Hillside Secure Children’s Home, which provided information on staff and
service planning and development for the period 1 November 2015 to 28 April
2016, as detailed within the circulated report.
Members were informed that there had been some
admissions of 11 year olds, which was an unusual
occurrence and an indication of the complexities of young people that the
Service was dealing with. It was highlighted that there had been three young
people from Neath Port Talbot admitted into Hillside during this period. The
higher number of admissions was historically from Children’s Homes. It was
highlighted that Hillside had also responded to the increased need in providing
secure beds for Police and Criminal Evidence Act (PACE) requests from the
Police and Emergency Duty Team.
It was highlighted that education attendance was
quite stable. It was noted that a lot of the young people had a low level of education
and it was a challenge to the professionals to meet need. The young people had
written to three influential people and had received a response from the Pope,
which was a boost for them. Members were informed that a Speech and Language
Therapist would be employed for two days a week. Members were pleased with this
positive development.
It was noted that there had been some staff
turnover and this was due to them leaving for other opportunities or
retirement. There had been some recruitment into posts and overall the team was
stable. There had been a lot more training opportunities for staff and the new
rota system had assisted with staff having the time to attend training
sessions. It was noted that sickness absence was higher than the Council average
and it was a challenging environment to work in. However, the appropriate
policies were being followed to manage this.
The average length of stay was two months and six
days. It was highlighted that by the time young people arrive at Hillside they
could have been through up to 24 different placements which would have further
traumatised them. If young people could be admitted to Hillside sooner and for
longer periods they could have more of an impact with the resources they now
had available.
The Trauma Recovery Model that was being used in
Hillside was proving effective and all staff were
receiving this training so there was a consistent approach to interactions with
young people. Staff had also been taken through a walkthrough of the first 24
hours of being admitted to secure care so they could view it from the
perspective of the young person. This process provided a number of positive
outcomes including admission information and aesthetic appearance of admission
areas and family room. Members were please that the Clinical Team was being
developed and the approach being taken by Hillside.
Members queried when a visit to Hillside could be
arranged and it was noted that there was an open day on 28 June 2016, further information would be circulated to Members.
Following scrutiny, it was agreed that the report
be noted.