Minutes:
The Committee were provided with an update regarding the development of
the Strategic Development Plan (SDP).
Reference was made to the letter that was sent to Welsh Government,
indicating Officers concerns regarding the requirements to deliver the SDP in
the absence of appropriate financial resources; in the letter, it was requested
that funding be made available to enable Offices to make progress in terms of
delivering the SDP.
Members were informed that the response from Welsh Government referred
to the funding that they had provided to assist in delivering the Regional
Transport Plan, and that there was opportunity to use any leftover resources
from that piece of work, in order to progress the SDP; the Minister had
confirmed, at that point in time, that no further funding was going to be
forthcoming for the development of the SDP. Officers explained that the
Regional Transport Plan had progressed significantly, and that there weren’t
any resources available from that budget to assist in developing the SDP.
Officers explained their intention to send another letter to Welsh
Government in order to reiterate their concerns and express the importance of
funding in order to appropriately resource and deliver the SDP. It was noted
that Officers from the South West Wales region had been in discussions with the
other Corporate Joint Committees in Wales to establish whether to send the
letter on behalf of all regions in Wales. It was stated that early indications
showed that Mid Wales and North Wales were content and prepared to sign up to
the letter; however, South East Wales had confirmed that they had prepared
their delivery agreement and therefore would not be in a position to sign up to
the letter. Further discussions had since taken place, and it was realised that
North Wales had also made progress with their delivery agreement; it was
therefore concluded that Mid Wales and South West Wales regions were in a
different position to North Wales and South East Wales.
It was mentioned that Officers had calculated the estimated cost of
preparing the SDP, which was in the region of between £3.5million and
£4.5million; this would be developed over five to six years and would require
around six dedicated Officers.
Officers had established that there weren’t any resources within
existing structures to re-deploy to develop the SDP; staff in existing teams,
within the four Local Authorities, were in the process of developing their
Replacement Local Development Plans or undertaking monitoring and evaluation
work. It was noted that the National Park Authorities were in a similar
position in terms of their staff resource.
Since these discussions had taken place, Officers had identified money
within the South West Wales Corporate Joint Committee’s (SWWCJC) limited level
of reserves; and had also received a letter from Welsh Government, indicating
that they were providing funding of up to £200k this year, to contribute
towards capacity and governance. It was explained that with the reserves and
funding from Welsh Government, there was now opportunity to progress with the
preparation of the delivery agreement; however, this did not mean that the
region would be able progress with the development of the SDP itself.
As previously mentioned, Officers were going to progress with sending
another letter to Welsh Government; however, it had since been determined that
two options should be put forward for Members consideration in terms of next
steps. It was highlighted that option one was to use the reserves to recruit an
experienced planning officer and start preparations on the delivery agreement
for the SDP; work wouldn’t be progressed further than this as it would require
significant additional funds and resources. Officers stated that option two was
to continue to hold the current position and not progress with the delivery
agreement until there were funds in place to prepare the document and the SDP.
The Regional Finance Manager reiterated the points raised regarding the
reserves and confirmed that the SWWCJC had agreed, when setting the budget in
January 2025, that £500k be used over the next three years. However, it was
noted that this total wasn’t set for Strategic Planning; the other workstreams
within the SWWCJC also needed to be considered.
The Committee provided their views in terms of the option that they
would prefer to endorse to the SWWCJC for decision. It was expressed that
option one would provide direction and indicate the desire to progress with the
development of the SDP; whilst still acknowledging that the appropriate funding
was required to be able to deliver on this workstream fully. However, not all
Members agreed with option one and stated a preference for option two, due to
the current financial pressures and the potential for additional funding to be
awarded to undertake this work.
A discussion took place in regard to the potential to unlock other,
creative ways of working to deliver the SDP; with a focus on the region, rather
than six separate plans from each planning authority. It
was explained that the six planning authorities within the region were required
to prepare a Replacement Local Development Plan; five out of six were in the
process of preparing those plans, with Pembrokeshire Coast National Park having
had their plan adopted and were currently undertaking monitoring and
evaluation. Officers explained that there was still a requirement to have
individual plans for each planning authority; however, the SDP would form one
plan to cover the whole region.
Further to the above, it was noted that once the SDP had been adopted,
Officers would be able to undertake a Local Development Plan Lite which was a
smaller and more concise version of what was being undertaken in each local
planning authority area; in the long term this would reduce pressures on each
local planning authority and the work that was required to go into the
development of Local Development Plans.
In the meantime, it was explained that Officers across each of the local
planning authorities had been working collaboratively to share processes and
collect and share evidence and methodologies for undertaking studies.
Officers confirmed that they were still waiting on guidance to be issued
from Welsh Government in terms of the formation of the SDP. The importance of
receiving the guidance was emphasised, particularly as it would make
considerable difference as to the scope of the plan; whether or not planning
authorities could be more creative in approach, would depend on the
expectations set out in the guidance and what areas of work needed to be
addressed. It was noted that the fact that the guidance manual hadn’t been
published, was another reason why Officers hadn’t already progressed with the
delivery agreement stage. Members were informed that without the guidance
Officers wouldn’t be able to make significant progress, past the delivery
agreement stage, as they would be unaware of what process Welsh Government
wanted authorities to follow.
Following the discussion, the majority of Members expressed preference
for option one to be considered by the SWWCJC.
RESOLVED:
That Option One, as detailed within the circulated report, be determined
as the preferred option on the commencement of work to deliver a Strategic Development Plan pursuant to
the Town and Country Planning (Strategic Development Plan) (Wales) Regulations
2021, and be endorsed for consideration by the South West Wales Corporate Joint
Committee (SWWCJC).
Supporting documents: