Decision:
Following scrutiny, the recommendation was supported to
Cabinet.
Minutes:
Michael D. Jones
Waste Services Manager introduced the report and explained that officers are
looking to regularise an operational position and give the council a formal
policy that will help officers operate going forward.
Members were informed
that the report is concerned with approximately 3000 properties covered by the
smaller vehicle collection rounds. The rounds are in outlying areas or
difficult to access areas with larger refuse collection freighters.
Officers explained
that the smaller vehicles do not have bin lifting equipment, and the council
must make provision for manual collection of black bags. Some residents are
presenting bins for collection, which is causing collection staff an issue to
empty them. This report is to formalise a position on this.
The chair noted that
only a few wards aren’t affected by this and referred members to the map with
locations of the rounds that had been circulated before the meeting.
Members noted a
contradiction: Recommendation D allows wheely bins for storage, but states bins
presented for collection will be removed. Page 11 mentions health and safety
concerns the council has with bins due to potential struggle of lifting them
safely.
Members asked how
staff will remove bins if they can't lift them because of these safety reasons.
Members asked if
staff do remove the bins, will they put them onto the small wagons and is there
a dedicated storage for the bins to stop them being damaged.
Members suggested
that there would not be enough room to store them on the small waggons.
Members noted the
report states bins may be reused on other collection rounds and asked who will
be responsible for cleaning and ensuring they are disinfected and fit for
reuse?
Members felt this
indicated that further people need to be re-deployed to do this work.
Members asked how it
will affect the residents who may have asked for a replacement bin but end up
with a second-hand bin rather than a new one?
Officers advised
there are a very small number of properties on the rounds presenting bins.
In relation to taking
the bins away that are presented, officers have vehicles within the fleet with
a tail lift that they use to deliver the bins. That vehicle can be used to
collect any bins that have been inappropriately presented.
Officers suggested
notifying residents in advance if their bins will be taken away, if they
present them again, allowing them to pull the bins in to avoid removal.
Members were informed
that officers collect inappropriately presented bins from properties such as
those who present multiple wheely bins. They used the example of if two bins
are presented then the additional bin will be brought back to the yard. This practice
is applied across the borough.
Suitable bins are
washed and reused. Damaged or dirty bins are recycled. Officers ensure only
bins fit for reuse are put back into circulation.
Members asked if
there is a van with a tail lift that could lift bins in the 1st place, why
couldn't it be used on the rounds?
Officers advised that
the bin lift operation with a tail lift is a very slow operation, and it would
slow staff down considerably and lifts the bin and the waste in it. This
differs from properties where officers operate a bin collection, the bin itself
is tipped and the waste is removed from it, this means that the bin lift
vehicle won't help staff to empty the bin.
Members asked if the
crews would have to report a wheelie bin and then another van would be sent to
collect it. Officers confirmed that is correct.
Members asked if
there is a 3 black bag limit for those residents if they have no bin?
Officers confirmed
that the limit on black bag collection across the borough is either one 140
litre wheel bin or three black bags.
The chair noted some
members felt that the information circulated wasn’t as detailed as they had
hoped and advised that if members want something at a ward level, they can send
that request for slightly more detailed map.
Members asked if
locations should be included in the policy. Officers advised against it based
on experience, noting that new properties are added due to access issues
identified during normal collections. The map is provided for members'
information to appreciate the spread of collections across the borough.
The chair stated that
Streetcare services also re-use the wheely bins for different purposes
including on Aberavon Sea front as overspill bins and at the tip.
Members asked what
disability groups were consulted on the report.
Officers advised that
the report is seeking to make sure that the collection crews are working within
manual health and safety rules. Any member of the public who has disability
concerns, are offered an assisted collection and that will still be offered after
the policy.
Members noted the
disability section of the IIA states "no effect" and questioned how
officers determined this without consulting disability groups?
Officers advised that
there was no consultation with disability groups on the basis that there is no
change or impact to the service provided to those groups.
Members felt that not
enough consultation is done with these groups in general.
Members asked how
this will be initially communicated to the residents and what the process would
be if people continue to present containers and then complain that the bins
aren't being collected?
Members asked if this
links up with ‘incorrect presentation’ and ‘excess waste’ policies.
Officers advised that
the issue affects only a small number of residents. Since few residents present
waste in wheelie bins, they don't plan to distribute this information across
the entire borough or to the 3,000 properties on the rounds.
Officers can first
communicate with residents to explain waste presentation requirements. If
non-compliance continues, they can use Section 46 to mandate specific
containers or bags after initial communication and education.
Members asked if the
policy should state the three-bag limit rather than three bin limit?
Officers noted that
there is a reference in the policy to the bin limit on the amount of waste
someone can present. Officers haven't specifically tied that into the number of
bins at this moment, this could change in the future depending on the situation.
Members clarified
that there is no initial information going out to the residents, or just
communication reacting to noncompliance. Officers confirmed that is the
intention.
Members suggested
placing stickers on bins and sending notification letters to ensure elderly
residents and those not fluent in English understand the policy that if the bin
is presented the next time, they know it will be removed. They also asked if a
window of opportunity could be given for residents to comply.
Members noted that
Aberavon residents were given bins to store bags in their gardens and
instructed not to present them. While most comply, there is concern that some
may put bins out without sufficient warning before removal.
Officers’ intention
is that they will have a stepped approach so that they can communicate with the
residents first if the bins are presented, the first step will be to
communicate.
Officers also have
stickers which they can use to communicate the future actions, but they will
not be taking bins away before they have communicated.
The Chair noted that
areas with many rental properties experience frequent resident changes, making
it challenging for people to understand the system. Proactive communication to
new residents may need to be considered.
Members agreed with
officers' plans. As rural residents, they are familiar with farm collections
and noted that many residents should know the rules.
Members asked if
there are farms where assisted collection is required, do the council provide
it?
Officers advised that
assisted collection is available across the borough but there are some limits
on some outlying properties, and it depends on whether they can get the
collection vehicle close enough to offer an assisted collection.
Members suggested
offering residents plastic containers for storing black bins before putting
them out, to reduce the association with wheelie bins, which are often seen as
containers for collection rather than storage.
Members also felt
that providing plastic containers on farms and outlying properties would reduce
the attraction of pests to black bags.
Officers advised that
they are looking to establish a clear policy for waste collection to ensure
efficiency and consistency. Given that manual emptying is involved, it’s
important to standardise the type of containers used.
Members were informed
that residents can use any containers they prefer between collections, but
waste must be presented in bags, and the borough provides either wheelie bins
or black bags for presentation, but not both. Members said they understand that
principle.
The Cabinet member,
Councillor Scott Jones stated that the discussions have been helpful and agreed
with the point that communication is key. He explained that there has already
been a directive from him as cabinet member that once they agree that this, that
the communication about this policy is targeted specifically to the 3000
properties affected, rather than the entire county borough. This approach can
help avoid unnecessary concerns or confusion among residents who are not
impacted by the change.
The cabinet member
said he has recommended to the rest of the cabinet that for the policy to be
implemented or agreed upon, communication must be made to the 3,000 properties.
He hoped that gave
assurance to the committee.
The cabinet member
believed that communicating the change would help identify any issues related
to disability among residents.
In relation to the
potential impact of stopping the pull-out service on disabled residents, the
cabinet member advised that if the service is discontinued, those residents
might struggle to take their bags to the storage bin due to their disabilities,
which could create similar issues for them as it does for the workforce.
The Cabinet member
stated wanted to make sure that the council communicates with people and if
there are specific issues to try and work with individuals and address it.
The cabinet member
noted that providing storage bins to 3,000 properties would cost approximately
£50,000. He raised concerns about recurring costs to replace lost, damaged, or
stolen containers and felt that finances are not available for this.
The Cabinet member
felt that the suggestion of having larger bins at the end of the street as a
central point poses challenges such as excess bags being presented and
difficulty in identifying who exceeds their bag allocation.
The chair thanked the
cabinet member for responding to some of the concerns of members.
Members highlighted
the issues that black bags cause in rural areas with wildlife.
Members also raised
the issue of terraced house residents incorrectly putting black bags in a
wheelie bin for presentation, to avoid wildlife ripping the bags. Those
residents have asked for containers, but that request was refused. Members
asked what can be done in this situation?
Officers noted the
concerns but re-iterated the challenges of providing containers and the issues
around the smaller vehicles. Officers confirmed they were looking to keep the
collections on the black bags in those areas.
Members noted that
residents sometimes carry black bags to a central space to avoid long walks and
difficult vehicle manoeuvres for the workforce. Staff however occasionally
leave bags with stickers indicating excess, requiring another van to collect
them, which is costly.
The chair felt this
highlighted the importance of understanding who's presented waste and that it
is easier with a wheelie bin.
Members had made
suggestions about providing stickers to those who have black bags to identify
the bags to the properties. The chair suggested that if the sticker is printed
with their address on that they must affix to a bag and if the bag's got a
valid sticker, it can be picked up, this may improve enforcement and avoid not
picking up bags from a central point. He felt that this would also show how
many bin collections there's going to be in a year and how many black bag
households are entitled to in a year.
Officers confirmed
that collection points make it difficult for officers to identify who's
presented the bags and how much excess waste has been presented. Officers
stated that they want people to recycle as much as possible but appreciated the
points raised and noted that further work neds to be done in identifying
presenting the bags.
The chair asked if
the new in cab data system will that extend to the vehicles on the black bag
collections and if crews will be able to identify a central pickup point.
Officers confirmed
that the in-cab system will extend across the whole fleet, and they have also
identified collection points across the borough as well, this information will
be available to crews.
Members acknowledged
the cost of containers but noted that black bag collection points would require
wheely bins, which also incur costs. They suggested conducting a feasibility
study to evaluate the potential savings from not using wheely bins. Members felt
that providing residents with an item they can't put out may alleviate issues
where people store bags in wheely bins but present them for collection. This
could help keep items off the road.
The chair noted that
it has the potential to lower the impact on vermin with people leaving black
bags in their gardens if they don't have a storage shed to put the bags in.
Members asked if the
council would stop supplying free black bags if containers are provided to
residents.
The cabinet member,
Councillor Scott Jones felt that it was a valid point and felt that they need
to be careful as he agreed originally to see if the council can provide
everybody with a bin as opposed to asking residents to go out and purchase
their own bin. However, the price of a storage bin was £15 in comparison if the
council providing an ordinary wheelie bin the cost would be between £40-£50.
The cabinet member
highlighted the importance of ensuring fairness and consistency in the
distribution of storage bins and black bags, across the county borough and felt
that a clear and equitable policy is essential to avoid any perceptions
inequality.
Following scrutiny,
the recommendation was supported to Cabinet.
Supporting documents: