Decision:
The
report was noted.
Minutes:
Peter
Austin Business Engagement Manager updated members on the Quarterly Portfolio
monitoring Q2 24/25 as included in the report pack.
Members
were advised that one of the most important things the committee should be
aware of is ‘risks’ and ‘issues’.
Officers
reminded members that concerns about slippage have been raised in past years.
They explained that slippage occurs in two ways: physical slippage, which is
the actual delivery of projects, and in-year financial slippage.
Officers
advised that they took the decision prior to the last joint committee to move
these from being risks to being issues because they are affecting the portfolio
delivery.
Members
were informed that this elevates the importance of slippages. Officers are
currently preparing a slippage report for the joint committee and scrutiny
committee, examining causes, effects, and possible mitigations to expedite
projects.
Members
were given the following highlights of the report.
• The Bay Technology Centre is currently
sitting at over 50% occupancy.
• SWITCH is progressing and is also
awaiting a decision by the transition board for extra funding through Tata.
• Pentre Awel is almost complete and is
due to open during this quarter. Officers explained that the dry and wet
leisure facilities will open prior to the health elements of it and that is
because of the amount of time it will take the health boards to fit out their
areas.
• Members were advised that the digital
infrastructure project is making excellent progress across all its three
delivery arms.
• Swansea waterfront will see 71/72
Kingsway building opening soon and officers noted that it is already making a
significant impact on the nightscape of Swansea. A pre-opening event has
happened, and the building will be open in quarter two this year.
• The Arena hotel negotiations are
progressing well and officers are positive.
• The Innovate Innovation Matrix with
Trinity St David opened during the summer and is over 50% occupied with
marketing for the existing space ongoing.
• Officers also advised that the
innovation precinct is progressing subject to a review with the partners due to
several reasons.
• Yr Egin Stage 1 is fully occupied and
is progressing well and stage 2 is, is currently being reassessed by the
delivery partners, because of a change in what the creative sector might
require after the pandemic.
• Homes as power stations is progressing
well but has experienced some slippage, which is down to the delivery partners
which are primarily either private or public sector housing associations. HAPS
has 2 demo houses up and running which show how effective the HAPS technology
can be.
• The Pembroke Dock Marine project now
has all the physical infrastructure works complete including the major
construction components within the port and the hangar annexes.
• The Campuses project is making good
progress with the Sketty Lane development procured and they have appointed a
contractor for design and build. This is
going to start with the advanced design element. They also have had a
successful Vodafone bid working with the Digital Infrastructure project as well
as part of that development.
In
relation to portfolio objectives members were concerned about the way in which
the investment is going. Members noted that officers are looking at the
definitions of investment and asked if that definition was clear.
Members
expressed concern that job creation timelines in the report might not align
with the front-loaded projects, potentially leaving posts unfilled for up to 15
years. They asked if officers expect universities to supply the needed
workforce.
Officers
clarified that the description focus is on the number of jobs created, not
necessarily the number of people. These jobs can be directly or indirectly
created across the portfolio. The 9,000 jobs were never expected to be directly
created by the projects themselves but are outcomes of the projects'
operations.
Officers
cited Swansea Arena as an example, noting that the new jobs created there are
significant. They also mentioned that the expansion of smaller businesses in
the Copper Bay Area, benefiting from the arena, counts as indirect job
creation.
Officers
noted a similar situation in Carmarthenshire with S4C moving to Yr Egin. While
half of the staff were relocated from Cardiff the rest were hired locally.
Members were informed that S4C's move created jobs, both directly and
indirectly, through the expansion of smaller supply chain businesses and the
creative sector.
Officers
are confident that 9,000 jobs will be created, but assessing the number of
people employed is a different matter.
Members
were informed that the opening of the Kingsway and the arrival of tenants will
create jobs. Some tenants will bring their own staff, while others will hire
locally, contributing to job creation.
Members
welcomed officers' confidence in reaching 9,000 jobs, noting the urgent need.
However, they were sceptical, pointing out that Swansea Arena, which cost over
£40 million to build, currently employs only 26 full-time staff. They felt this
number is low given the investment.
Members
felt that jobs that go to 71/72 the Kingsway will down to displacement from
other places because firms that are in the area are going to move in there.
Members
felt that in Llanelli the current leisure centre will close, and the staff will
be moving over to the new one in Pentre Awel so it won’t necessarily create
additional jobs.
Members
felt that it is important that officers have the confidence in job creation
because members are asked by the public where the jobs will be coming from the
public investment put in and they can give the public that reassurance.
Members
noted that there is normally a benefits realisation register as part of the report,
and they were disappointed that it wasn’t included as it gives them a quick
overview of the jobs that have been created and the investment that's come in
that particular quarter.
Members
noted that on Page 177 it says benefits realisation and increasing jobs, but it
isn’t the same as the previous iterations.
The
democratic services officer advised that he would check on this omission and
see if that information can be provided or check if that information can be
re-included in reports in the future.
The
report was noted.
Supporting documents: