Decision:
Members
noted the verbal progress reports from officers on the RTP development
workstreams.
Members
Endorsed the Regional Transport Plan policy framework.
Members Endorsed the revised RTP development work programme.
Minutes:
Members
considered the Regional Transport Plan Policy (Draft) and consultation update
as circulated within the agenda pack.
Officers
outlined that the purpose of the report was to provide an update to members on
the Regional Transport Plan (RTP), the different work streams that have been
developed and the progress that has been made. The second purpose of the report
is to seek support from the committee on the policy framework that has been
drafted. Officers confirmed that the policy framework has taken into account
the framework issued by Welsh Government and made it applicable to a local
framework. The final purpose is the endorsement of the revised RTP development
work programme.
Officers
noted that the timescale is challenging but that significant progress is being
made against this. Officers advised that a book of data has been produced which
will assist in understanding the region and the likely impacts on the transport
network. Officers confirmed that large amount of analysis has been undertaken
that considers accessibility to key travel points within the region, mainly
focusing on travel time. It also takes into account active travel.
Officers
confirmed that there has been positive feedback on the case for change from
Welsh Government and it has been subject to the recent consultation. There have
been 814 responses to the consultation, the vast majority of these responses
were from individuals. The two key emerging themes identified from the
consultation were a concern about the potential of active travel measures that
the plan may include. Also the recognition in the consultation that active
travel space may not be suitable for everyone, particularly in the more rural
areas. The second theme was the availability and cost of public transport, both
bus and rail. In addition to this there was concern about the frequency of
operation, the fares that are charged and the coverage of the network. Concerns
also incorporated effective interchange between the bus and rail networks.
A
key activity identified over the coming weeks will be engagement with technical
stakeholders. A report will be brought forward outlining the activities
undertaken, for consideration at a later date.
Officers
are currently in the process of setting out the basis of the integrated
wellbeing assessment. There will be engagement with the relevant statutory
bodies to agree with the scoping analysis of the assessment.
Members
noted that the Independent Travel Active Board have published a about walking
and cycling where described Wales as making ‘painfully slowing progress’ in
getting people walking and cycling. Whilst it was acknowledged that the report
has only just been published, members queried what consideration this report
will be given to ensure that the best value is achieved in terms of walking and
cycling?
Officers
recognised that the active travel option will not be an option that will fit
for all. It will be more pertinent in some areas that others. The policy
framework has been drafted to reflect the priorities across a diverse region.
Whilst it recognises walking and cycling, it also reflects the need to
incorporate the other modes of transport. However, officers noted that they
have not yet been able to consider the report in detail at this point. Officers
confirmed that they are following the direction of national policy in terms of
how they build up to the Regional Transport Plan and what they can subsequently
bid into for capital schemes.
Members
queried how the CJC sees its role in delivering active travel across the
region. It was acknowledged that each individual authority has their own
policies on this. Members queried if the CJC had given any thoughts with
regards to what their focus will be on, for example will it be key
cross-boundary routes or key arterial routes for economic development? Members
considered the CJC a catalyst to assist with the delivery of the
infrastructure. It is important when considering a transport network, that a
person can complete an entire journey. Members were keen to understand how far
into the local authorities remit on active travel, the CJC would be reaching
into.
Members
referred to the Independent Active Travel Board report and noted that it
recommends that future government funding be used to focus on one or two towns
within each local authority to ensure greater impact. However, members noted
that it is rural areas which need supporting if the RTP is going to make a big
impact and be successful, and that funding needs to be considered across the
region.
Members
referred to the amount of money that is being spent on active travel. It was
concerning to some members that active travel appears to not take into
consideration those who may not be able to or have difficulty walking and
cycling. Members considered that investment should be more widespread and take
into account other modes of transport. Members queried if officers are linking
with the bus services in relation to the RTP?
Members
suggested that there needs to be a systematic approach which links between all
modes of transport and spread across the region. Members expressed their
concern and the requirement for further definition around some of the policies
outlined.
Officers
outlined that in order to gain a modal shift it would not just be a matter of
capital investment. There is an element of providing the infrastructure,
encouragement and awareness of promotion that needs to be done. In order to
promote active travel it needs a modal shift, for people to be comfortable to
change their patterns and do something that they may not be used too. Not only
does this change require changes in infrastructure, but it also requires
further funding for the building and the maintenance, to ensure things are
maintained to a good standard.
Traditionally,
active travel related to the shorter journeys and specifically surrounded
cycling and walking. However, there is an element of normalising longer active
journeys then there will be a significant benefit all around.
There
is a clear message from Welsh Government, that there must be prioritisation of
sustainable modes of transport. Officers of the CJC are trying to interpret the
policies and provide recommendations that can be implemented through the RTP and
the various individual local authority plans.
Members
encouraged colleagues to read the Active Travel guidance as it sets out the aim
of active travel is to make communities accessible.
Following
scrutiny, members noted the verbal progress reports from officers on the RTP
development workstreams; members endorsed the Regional Transport Plan policy
framework; members endorsed the revised RTP development work programme.
Supporting documents: