Minutes:
Transport for
Wales provided a presentation which outlined their work on the Swansea Bay and
West Wales Metro; this included the rail programme and the bus programme. The
Committee was also informed of how Transport for Wales
colleagues could support Local Authorities in their strategic transport
planning, and the resources that could be utilised within Transport for Wales
to support the delivery of the regional work.
Rail Programme
The presentation
displayed how the South West Wales area was segmented in terms of the rail
programme, and captured the course of the South Wales Main Line, which ran
through West Wales and Swansea Bay. Members were informed of the interchange
improvements that Transport for Wales had been working on; the relevant
stations were clearly highlighted within the presentation. It was explained
that the focus for the West Wales area was identifying how rail
frequency/service frequency could be increased; and the focus for the Swansea
Bay area was on the urban metro intervention, and making use of rail
infrastructure that presently wasn’t used for passenger rail services.
A discussion
took place in regards to the rail priorities for West Wales, which included a
summary of the route options and frequency. The presentation displayed a
summary of the current frequency of rail service at each of the principle
stations. It was noted that the annual trips for each principle station was
calculated, which provided an understanding of the general demand; it was mentioned
that the presentation did not include all stations for the West Wales area,
however it provided a general picture of the current route options.
Transport for
Wales explained that over a number of years, they had been working on business
cases to establish new frequencies; each of these could be identified in the
presentation, and were captured in a key of ‘additional service summary’. It
was stated that if all of the additional route options could be assembled, the
frequencies would improve; the proposed service increase was detailed for each
of the stations. Members were informed that this would double the rail
frequency across the network. It was mentioned that the Grand Union Trains
secured rights to run trains through to Carmarthenshire, and this would be
additional to the routes that were displayed within the presentation.
The Committee
were provided with a summary of the three principle route options Transport for
Wales had been looking at in the Swansea Bay area:
·
Tram-Train Swansea to Aberdulais and/or
Clydach (red line) – this was noted to be a very complex endeavour, as the line
would be weaved through a densely built up urban area in Swansea; however, it
had proved to be resilient during the discussions around the development as it
would be a huge area of growth and generate a lot more trips, particularly due
to the positioning of the Swansea Bay University Campus. It was added that
Transport for Wales had continued to work on this route option, and would
consult with Members at pertinent points in the development of the project;
although it would be a long term project.
·
Pembrey & Burry Port to Swansea (yellow
line) – it was explained that Transport for Wales had been undertaking work to
re-establish the railway station at Cockett, which would increase the frequency
on this line by a further two trains an hour; in addition to the trains that
were already in operation. Transport for Wales highlighted that they had
investigated whether that frequency could be increase further, to four trains
an hour, however this would create a lot of other frequency requirements
elsewhere if it was to be increased. Members were informed that this route
option could be delivered in the short term, as the majority of the
infrastructure was already there and in use, due to it being an existing
passenger railway line.
·
Pontarddulais to Swansea via Neath (green line) – it was stated this route did not
presently benefit from passenger rail services. Transport for Wales had
developed proposals for a service to run from Pontarddulais to Swansea
operating initially on a basis of two trains an hour. Transport for Wales had
also been looking into the option of making a commercial case to extend one of
those services up to Ammanford; there were technical issues associated with this
case, however these were being addressed. It was explained that there were some
new railway stations on this line, which currently didn’t exist and were in the
heart of a number of large suburban communities; including Pontlliw, Felindre,
Morriston, Llandarcy, Winch Wen and Landore. The Committee was informed that
Transport for Wales had consulted on these opportunities, however were not in a
position to confirm that all will be delivered. Officers highlighted that there
was a compelling case for each station to be built at the right time, and under
the right conditions; Transport for Wales had yet to take a view of which
station would be best suited to be built first.
Following on
from the above, it was mentioned that the presentation did not display how the
rail network would interact with the bus network; the hope and expectation from
Transport for Wales, was that in time the bus and rail networks will work
seamlessly through integrated ticketing and a better ability to plan the
timetables. It was stated that this will transform the area as an urban
transport opportunity in the coming years.
The discussions
turned towards the type of demand associated with these stations, and the
anticipated travel times between stations; the exact information could not be
provided, however Officers were able to provide an idea based on technical
reports and theoretical extrapolations.
In regards to
additional passenger journeys on the network, it was noted that between the
yellow and green line included in the presentation, this represented between
1.3-1.7 million additional trips onto the rail network each year; a million
plus of which, on the green line, presently had no opportunity for rail
connectivity. In the Wales national context, it was explained that this project
was one of three that would be able to attract that level of additional growth;
therefore, Officers were able to make a very compelling case to secure the high
levels of investment that would be needed to develop this project further.
In terms of travel
times, it was raised that not all passengers on this network would be
travelling to Swansea; areas such as Neath and
Llanelli would benefit greatly from this project, and there were reductions in
travel time to a number of locations including Cardiff. It was highlighted that
when discussing the totality of travel on the network, there were some
improvements and benefits for the travelling public, and the ability to meet
targets set by Wales Transport Strategies;
The rail
investment priorities for South West Wales were provided to the Committee,
which included the South Wales Mainline, the Swansea Bay Area Metro and the
West Wales Rail Frequency. It was stated that Transport for Wales were making
representations to the Wales Rail Board to secure investment going forward;
Local Authorities were encouraged to assist with this by lobbying and
representing these matters in the Regional Transport Plan. It was noted that
there were similar exercises being undertaken in areas such as South East Wales
and North Wales, and it would be important to press this to ensure that the
investment can be sought for the South West. Officers mentioned that there were
a number of technical variations to existing baseline service that Leaders questioned; Transport for Wales would
be preparing advice notes on these.
Members raised queries in regards to the cost of the project. Transport
for Wales confirmed that the calculations of the costings had been undertaken
and were published on the Welsh Government website; it was agreed that this
information will be circulated to the Committee following the meeting. Officers
highlighted that the red line route would be the most costly due to the
complexity, and the fact that it would be a long term project. It was stated
that when considering the costs against the rail priorities for Wales and how
many additional passengers would be brought in to use the rail network, the
benefits provided a significant case; however, it would be important to be
mindful in regards to strategizing the investment and what could be achieved.
It was asked if Transport for Wales had identified the journey time and
passenger demand figures for the proposed service extension to a new station in
Ammanford. Transport for Wales colleagues confirmed
that options had been tested in the Ammanford area, and some of the figures
were avaliable. It was mentioned that the analytics team in Transport for Wales
were preparing data and transport modelling packs to give to Local Authorities
to inform and support their Regional Transport Plan development; these will
contain some information in regards to travel demand, whether there was latent
and/or suppressed demand, and accessibility planning.
A discussion took place in regards to the Regional Transport Sub
Committee’s role in this work going forward. It was noted that for the next
meeting, Transport for Wales could provide information in regard to the
transport modelling data.
Bus Programme
The Committee
were informed that there was a large number of areas in which Welsh Government,
Local Government and Transport for Wales were working on to reform the way bus
services were provided in Wales; the bus programme was subject to a huge area
of transition and some turmoil in Wales currently. It was noted that there were
a number of complex issues that needed to be dealt with simultaneously; it was
realised that there short term challenges that would need to be considered in
the first instance, which was evident from dealing with the Bus Emergency
Scheme.
In terms of long
term planning, it was mentioned that there was cause to believe that the region
could deliver a bus programme that was substantially better than what was
currently avaliable, which would offer a greater amount of control to the
public sector in the way these services would be provided; however, there would
be a number of complexities in delivering the project, and difficulties in
working with the public transport operators, particularly in the challenging
circumstances post Covid-19. The presentation highlighted the areas in which
work was ongoing across Wales.
Members were
informed that there was a bus network planning exercise currently ongoing; in
the context of the Regional Transport Plan, this exercise could be of benefit
and use for Local Governments. It was mentioned that Transport for Wales was
already working with the public transport managers across the region, to
tentatively work through this exercise in order for Local Authorities to
utilise the findings.
Transport for Wales colleagues stated that there had been a number of
inefficiencies that had arisen through the bus network in recent years. It was
noted that privatisation had fallen into positions of inefficiency where the
competition within the industry had created too much complexity on routes,
which then created complex timetables for the public to consume; in which there
were different services running alongside each other, often with tickets that
did not interchange between services due to them being private operators.
Following on from
the above, it was explained that Transport for Wales had undertaken a planning
exercise where it baselined the bus network in Wales. The presentation detailed
the network that was currently operating, and then how the transport modelling
data could be used to identify where passengers were travelling to and from,
which would then start to develop bus networks which were intended to be less
complex, more direct and efficient. It was mentioned that some of this work
could be completed by common cooperation with the bus operators, however the
majority would need to be done on a voluntary basis on their part; and some
would not be carried out unless the way in which bus was provided in Wales was
reformed. Officers added that Welsh Government were also starting discussions
around introducing bus franchising and the hope to drive greater efficiency
through this.
A discussion
took place in regards to the current position of this work; Transport for Wales
had developed their initial plan for the network, and were able to explain why
they think it would be the best way forward for the network. It was noted that
the next steps would be to liaise with the transport managers at each Local
Authority, as they understood their locality in greater detailer; the conversations
with transport managers would explore the approach, and consider the strong
points and weak points for that particular area.
The presentation
provided an insight into the work relating to planning bus services in order to
create a joined up and coordinated network, and how this could flow in terms of
process; however, Officers explained that the focus currently was on setting up
those conversations with transport managers.
It was noted
that bus decarbonisation was one of the more visible areas of investment in
South West Wales presently. Members were informed that the Traws-Cymru T1
service from Carmarthen to Aberystwyth was electrified in the spring of this
year; it represented a significant improvement in terms of passenger experience
and the facilities provided, and also served to decarbonise that service.
Officers explained that this was a contribution towards the targets set by Net
Zero Wales, in which Welsh Government had established a target to decarbonize
bus public transport by 2035; as well as hitting the top most polluting 50% of
those buses by 2028. It was mentioned that there was a lot of work being
carried out in the Traws Cymru services across Wales to decarbonise those buses
first.
Transport for
Wales confirmed that they had been looking at business cases to bring hydrogen
fuel cell buses into the Swansea Bay and Pembrokeshire areas; Swansea Bay was
currently running ahead of those two areas, and the Deputy Minister for Climate
Change had given approval for that project to move on in its development. It
was noted that Officers were motivated to ensure that Pembrokeshire would be
the next area to obtain the funding for this element of work. The Committee was
informed that if both of these projects were to be established, it would create
a daily demand for hydrogen; this would not only benefit and service these
projects, but allows Councils, as a major fleet operator in the public sector,
to also speculate and test hydrogen for other parts of their fleet.
Officers
provided an explanation as to why the Swansea Bay area had progressed further
with the hydrogen fuel cell buses. It was stated that there were a number of
conspicuous centres of academic research based around Swansea Bay which were
expected to enable greater learning and partnership around this work. It was
also noted that the Gateway 2 Zero site was increasingly proving to become
quite an asset as a seed to start the Swansea University project, which was
backed by Welsh Government; the project was focused on establishing an electric
only forecourt, with an expectation that hydrogen refuelling will follow along
shortly after. Officers added that they were increasingly optimistic that a
hydrogen bus depot could be established in this area, and the operators had
demonstrated that they were more than willing to work with Transport for Wales
on this.
The presentation
highlighted the immediate challenges associated with the hydrogen bus element,
as well as the proposed project structure. It was explained that the
expectation would be that Transport for Wales and Welsh Government would look
after the fleet component in terms of depot and the actual vehicles themselves;
and work with third sector and private partners dealing with fuel and supply
issues. It was added that Transport for Wales would work with the Corporate
Joint Committee in the development of the RTP to ensure that the bus priority
infrastructure was being delivered, along with the journey time improvements in
order to make the most of these considerable assets that will be invested in
over the coming years.
Supporting documents: