To
select appropriate items from the Cabinet Board agenda for Pre-Decision
Scrutiny (Cabinet Board reports included for Scrutiny Members)
Decision:
Tai
Tarian Update
The
report was noted.
Childrens
Services Risk Management Mini Health Check
The
report was noted.
Information
Sharing in Respect of The National Review of Care Planning for Children and
Young People Subject to the Public Law Outline Pre- Proceedings
The
report was noted.
Neath
Port Talbot Youth Justice and Early Intervention Draft Youth Justice Plan
2022-2023 (Renamed in the meeting as Youth Justice and Early Intervention
Service Grading Analysis of the Youth Justice Plan 2022-2023)
The
report was noted.
Minutes:
Tai Tarian Update
The Chief Executive of Tai Tarian gave members
an overview of the work carried out in 2022-2023 as detailed in the circulated
report. Tai Tarian work closely with the authority to determine housing
requirements and greatest need.
Members were advised that Tai Tarian have been
marked positively in all 45 of the available elements of the Considerate
Constructor Gold Award; this is the first time this award has been achieved in
Neath Port Talbot.
Members queried the relationship between
Councillors and Tai Tarian. There are no Councillors that are currently Board
members but there is a close relationship with members. When working locally,
members are invited to site visits.
Members noted that the authority are developing
a new Housing Strategy and queried how did Tai Tarian see the strategic
relationship developing between the association and the local authority
currently and in the future? The Chief Executive of Tai Tarian responded that
there has always been a strong relationship and the ability to develop within
the borough has grown. The relationship has developed to be a really strong
one. Tai Tarian also work closely with other housing associations and it is
hoped that there is an open relationship with the local authority, where
requests would be responded to promptly.
Members thanked Tai Tarian for their support and
noted the benefits to local tradespeople seeking employment.
The report was noted.
Childrens Services Risk Management Mini Health
Check
The Head of Children’s Services outlined the
content of the report which is presented for consideration.
Members asked what are the challenges and
weaknesses and where and what actions are in place to rectify any weaknesses.
Is monitoring in place and what exactly is the cabinet member role and has any
training been given. What is working well and how?
Officers confirmed that they were delighted with
the outcome of the inspection but acknowledged there was always room for
improvement. The findings are evidence based. The Cabinet Member for Childrens
Services is kept up to date on all matters. Seminars on Safeguarding and
Deprivation of Liberties were recently delivered to members. There are many
challenges but the service is striving for continuous improvement. The key
challenge is the authorities’ response to harm outside the family home and
officers acknowledged that there is still a lot of work to be done across the
partnership.
Members commented that the report highlighted
that staff retention is considered good but this has not always been the case
and queried what has changed?
Officers confirmed that the authority remains
under pressure due to a national shortage of qualified social workers but has
moved to a position where during Covid there was a slight increase in staffing
levels. Officers noted that the support of the council to offer a market
supplement has made a difference to staff recruitment.
Members noted that there were only two part time
workers and this was pleasing as agency workers have been a problem in the
past. It was noted that situations can change quickly within Social Services
and the service are adapting to this. Members gave their congratulations for an
incredible report and reported the service is one to be proud of.
Members queried the statement in the report
‘Regulators have commented on the services positive work & attitude to
responding to actions from inspections and continually striving to seek out
& implement developmental improvement’ and asked how well are the processes
working and how do you know they are working so well?
Officers responded that although every
opportunity is taken to celebrate success, there is still room for improvement.
The service is aspirational, outward facing and continually developing and this
has been recognised in all inspections. The service carries out health checks
and the work on the Quality Assurance Framework is transparent. Partners and
service recipients are contacted for performance feedback. A Parent Advocacy
Network is being developed across the region, bringing parents together who
will support other parents.
Members queried the context of the term ‘drift’
used in the report. Officers confirmed that this was in relation to open cases
within Children Services that are moving through the system without any work
being carried out. To reduce this occurring, a number of drift indicators are
in place; how frequently child have been visited, case activity, plans,
assessments and visits, this ensures that open cases are in the right place
allowing the service to work with families through any need or risk identified.
The aim is to eliminate cases just under the radar and not being worked as
expected; partners in health, education and police are brought in as critical
friends.
Members asked when the risk register was last
reviewed and how regularly? Officers confirmed that the risk register has only
recently been updated and since meeting with Risk Management partners to
undertake this exercise a number of other risks have been introduced to the
register. The register is reviewed fortnightly through the Quality Practice
Strategic Group and action plans are in place to address the identified risks.
The strategic risk register has been in place for some time but has recently
been revised as the corporate centre had revised the guidance on the strategic
risk register.
The report was noted.
Information Sharing in Respect of The National
Review of Care Planning for Children and Young People Subject to the Public Law
Outline Pre- Proceedings
The Head of Children’s Services outlined the
content of the report which is presented for consideration. The inspection
report in letter form is the outcome of an inspection in terms of the Public
Law Outline (PLO).
Officers outlined the reorganisation that was
carried out 10 years ago when it was recognised that the infrastructure in
place for children and young people was not meeting needs. A front-loaded
system was implemented to ensure that the most up to date system, information
and support services were in place in order to support children and young
people.
Officers explained that PLO is used where
assessments have been completed by Childrens Services, support has been given
to families and the risks have not reduced sufficiently. The authority therefore
meets a threshold to meet with Lawyers to discuss cases in an organised way to
avoid Court proceedings. Over recent years the authority has drastically
reduced the number of cases entering pre-proceeding arrangements and court
proceedings. This decrease is attributed to organisation and culture.
Principal Officers from Childrens Services
outlined the rigour in the authorities system, the decision to enter public law
is the decision of the Social Worker but the Principal Lawyer provides legal
advice.
Officers gave an outline of the proceedings
where cases are taken to PLO and how families are informed. Expert assessments
are taken into account during the 16 week PLO process and to avoid drift,
mid-way reviews are carried out. Currently there are eleven families subject to
PLO and nine families in care proceedings.
Officers gave an overview on Audits/Interviews,
the service has an embedded quality assurance programme which provides a health
check and ensures practice is maintained at a high standard. Officers are given
advance notice of inspections and the scope/type of cases being inspected.
Officers confirmed that the presentation from
this particular inspection received good feedback from inspectors.
Officers advised members that when the authority
was informed of the PLO inspection, much work had already taken place
internally and therefore Neath Port Talbot was the pilot agency in Wales. At
the same time of the inspection, National PLO guidance was introduced and the
new guidance was implemented into all PLO processes.
Following publication of the report letter, the
authority are leading the way nationally and officers have been contacted by
other local authorities enquiring about our processes. Officers lead a sub
group with the local Family Justice Board so that officers can consistently
practice in a PLO way across Wales. Officers advised members that the
inspection recommendations were easily implemented. A PLO leaflet has already
been developed and is out for consultation with parents. A celebratory letter
when families have completed PLO has already been implemented. The final
recommendation to use plain language when working with young people and
families and this is something that officers are already working on.
Members had no questions but commented it was a
good detailed report and a good briefing.
The report was noted.
Neath Port Talbot Youth Justice and Early
Intervention Draft Youth Justice Plan 2022-2023 (Renamed in the meeting as
Youth Justice and Early Intervention Service Grading Analysis of the Youth
Justice Plan 2022-2023)
This item had previously been published under
the access to meeting paragraph but officers have agreed to discuss the item
publicly.
Officers gave an overview of the report; the
analysis and grading of the Youth Justice Plan; ratified in September 2022. The
plan, which is acknowledged to be complex and detailed was graded as good by
the Youth Justice Board.
Members agreed to look at the grading’s when
they are brought back to Scrutiny Committee as it was difficult to scrutinise
in the current format.
Officers confirmed more detail will be
incorporated into this year’s plan which will be available shortly. Members
congratulated officers on the grading’s achieved.
Members requested a visit to Base 15. Officers
confirmed that an invitation will be forthcoming and there will also be an
opportunity to visit the Turnaround project which is being launched shortly.
The Chair questioned what systems are in place
to support young people with Autistic Spectrum Disorder (ASD) & Neuro
Diverse Development (NDD), the officer advised, young people entering the
service will receive an assessment to consider any additional learning needs
and interventions are planned accordingly. There are a range of interventions available
to support young people, starting with speech and language assessments and
specialised provision for young people with Autism or Asperger’s. Young people
can receive targeted intervention through referral to Autside. The team
includes an education worker with access to the full education database
therefore any additional learning needs are known prior to the young person
entering the service. There are a range of services to engage young people to
develop their social skills, hairdressing, bike maintenance, music projects.
Officers have signed up to ASDAN which supports
young people to complete lower level qualifications’ in addition to any
qualifications they are completing in school. Officers are working closely with
education partners to identify young people at an earlier point to carry out
preventative interventions to prevent young people entering the criminal
justice system and as an alternative to exclusions. Young people who are
identified as having an additional learning need are supported at every point
of the process whether that’s at court, police station, ensuring the presence
of an appropriate adult, ensuring police are aware of any needs.
Members questioned behavioural issues associated
with ADHD i.e. young people displaying traits without a diagnosis. The waiting
list is 3-6 weeks for CAHMS and 28 months for the Neuro Diverse Development
Service. Members queried if a referral from the Youth Justice Team is given an
earlier appointment? The Officer confirmed that the Youth Justice Service had
no preferential treatment for waiting times. Young people with traits are
identified through the speech and language therapist who will liaise with the
school to initiate the appropriate pathway, often progressing the pathway
themselves if the school does not feel it is appropriate.
Members asked what are the next steps when all
resources have been exhausted and the young person is still prolifically
offending. The Officer confirmed that there is access to an advanced case
management model consisting of a forensic psychologist linked to specialist
team in CAHMS, who will produce a formulation of the young person’s life from
pre-birth to the current day, working with multiple partners on different
strategies, this is subject to three monthly reviews.
Members questioned whether data and analysis was
available on the background of families in relation to alcohol and drugs.
Following the last inspection each area of the service; prevention, bureau and
court arena was analysed to understand the background of the young people to
try to understand their circumstances, which could make them more vulnerable to
entering the service. The information is reported to management board on a
quarterly & annual basis. Previously the data was quantitative but it is now
also qualitative, the child is seen first and a young offender second.
Members noted that the report contained a quote
from a young person saying it had helped to have someone to talk to and they
had listened to the advice given, members questioned whether the young person
had re-offended. No details could be given but officers can find out further
details if needed.
The report stated that ‘Young people don’t want
to be talked at or about, they want to be seen heard, believed and respected’.
Members questioned if support workers also embed that respect has to be earned;
it’s a two way relationship. Officers confirmed that it is a trauma informed
service and staff have full training in working with young people. Officers
noted that young people can be very traumatised and frightened when they first
enter the service.
Members questioned the numbers of looked after
children and asked what extra support was in place to prevent looked after
children being criminalised after leaving care. Officers confirmed that data on
the amount of looked after children offending will be included in the next
plan, it is part of the quarterly data and will feed into the annual
information. It was acknowledged that looked after children are at a higher
risk of entering the youth justice system and there is a national drive to
reduce criminalisation of looked after children.
Members commented that there is a Welsh
Government All Wales Protocol to reduce criminalisation, members are often
unaware of such information. Members requested that officers could circulate
any information to members when available.
The report was noted.