To
select appropriate items from the Cabinet Board agenda for Pre-Decision Scrutiny
(Cabinet Board reports included for Scrutiny Members)
Minutes:
Disposal
of Land at Neath Leisure Centre
Members were presented with information relating to the
disposal of land at Neath Leisure Centre, as detailed within the report
circulated.
Members advised that there is a sub-lease within the Sub Aqua Club who lease a garage adjacent to the leisure centre. They have been advised that there is no provision for them at the new centre, however they will be able to use the new swimming pool for their weekly sessions.
Members asked that, when development of the site takes place, that consideration is given to leisure, wellbeing, tourism and the Council’s decarbonisation programme. Officers advised that they would take on board the comments and pass to the Head of Regeneration, to whom the responsibility of the building will pass.
Members queried if any assistance was offered to the Sub Aqua Club in finding alternative accommodation. Further, the IIA identified that there was no impact on centre users, however Members disputed this. Members said that there was an impact as one of the centre users was being directly affected by the disposal of the land by being given notice on their lease.
Officers confirmed that there has been some discussion with the Sub Aqua Club about alternative accommodation, however there would be costs associated with this. Currently the Sub Aqua club does not have to pay accommodation costs. The Sports Council are unable to offer any grant to support the club. It is understood the Cabinet Member is trying to investigate alternative accommodation for the club.
Members asked the officer to amend the IIA to take into account the impact identified on the current users.
Following scrutiny,
members were supportive of the proposal to be considered by Cabinet.
Welsh
in Education Strategic Plan
Members were
presented with information relating to the Welsh Education Strategic Plan
(WESP), as detailed within the report circulated.
The plan notes that
annual updates will be provided to Members. Members queried if officers
considered annual updates sufficient. Officers advised that they would be
agreeable to reporting back on a higher frequency if members wished them to do
so. However, an annual report will allow for a full view of all the activity
throughout the year.
In consideration of
the objectives of the WESP, members queried if and how these would be taken
into consideration in future decisions of the authority. Officers anticipated
that the seven objectives identified within the plan would have group leaders,
and these leaders would meet on a regular basis throughout the year. The leader
would report back to the WESP Forum, and the forum would then report to the
relevant committee.
Members were in
general agreement that an annual report would suffice.
Following scrutiny,
members were supportive of the proposal to be considered by Cabinet.
Play
Sufficiency Assessment
Members were
presented with information relating to the Play Sufficiency Assessment, as
detailed within the report circulated.
Officers advised
that the consultant will be amending the report with regards to the number of wards
and an updated report will be circulated. The report refers to both four and
five wards without supervised play. The correct number is five wards.
Members queried how
many qualified staff currently work in the early years’ provisions
schools.
Officers outlined
how evidence for the report was gathered and what it took into consideration as
part of the assessment. It was confirmed that officers are also working closely
with Neath Port Talbot College with regards to the remit of the training of early
years’ staff.
Members noted that
antisocial behaviour in parks was seen as a barrier to play. Members queried
how officers were working with the police to address this issue. Officers noted
that antisocial behaviour could be considered various types of behaviour.
The action plan
identifies the need to consider the membership of the Play Strategy
Implementation Group and who is required to be a member to assist with taking
these actions forward. The police are identified as one of the partners who
need to be engaged within the process to help take it forward.
Members queried
what was being done with the five areas that are not covered by play
provisions. Officers that, although the report may indicate that there is no
specific provision within the ward boundary, this does not necessarily reflect
the position, as the play provision may simply sit just outside the boundary.
Officers advised that a map outlining the position of the provisions would
perhaps provide a more indicative position of current play provisions in
relation to houses.
Members asked for a
definition of supervised play. Officers confirmed the play sufficiency
assessment takes into account play, sport, leisure and culture for children
0-17. The report takes into account desktop and face to face research. Members
expressed their concern that a lot of the identified play provision was missing
from the report. Officers advised that the document is a living document and an
annual update is provided to Welsh Government following the end of the financial
year.
In relation to the
budget identified within the report, Members queried how much can be done
within existing hours and funding. The budget for the current year did propose
an increase in youth funding, and members asked for confirmation that this
would continue. With regards to new funding, Members queried if any had yet
been identified. Officers recognised that a piece of work would need to be
carried out to strengthen communications with the wider services within the
Council.
Concern was
expressed about the delays in refurbishment works to current play areas,
including closure of play areas.
Following scrutiny,
members were supportive of the proposal to be considered by Cabinet.