·
To select appropriate items from the Cabinet agenda for pre-decision
scrutiny (cabinet reports enclosed for Scrutiny Members)
Minutes:
The Committee
scrutinised the following cabinet items:
Revenue Budget Update
and Monitoring Report 2020-21
The Committee was
presented with the Revenue Budget Update and Monitoring Report 2020-21 which
provided an overview of the financial implications of COVID 19 on the Council’s
Financial Resources and 2020/21 Budget.
Detailed in the
circulated reported it stated that Welsh Government had funded £424k for loss
of income for the Arts Venues during the period April to June, to which it was
asked how that money had been utilised. It was noted that the Council had
budgeted for income for the whole of the year; the venues had been closed for
nine months, and staff expected them to be closed for the remaining three
months of the year. This money was mentioned to be the total value of income
that the Council would have been generating, which covered the costs therefore
all costs had been re-funded. It was added that the Arts Venues staff had not
been furloughed, and instead had been re-deployed.
In relation to
residential placements for children at risk, the report stated that there had
been an £385k overspend; it was asked whether the Council was anticipating that
the need for more residential placements would increase further. Officers
confirmed that this year there had been just over two additional placements;
the budget had been increase by two placements as there were now 11 children in
placement and staff were expecting it to stay around this number for some time.
It was noted that the Council were not anticipating additional residential care
need, above the 11 that were mentioned, although this was difficult to assess.
Officers anticipated that there would be increased pressures on the Looked
After Children (LAC) system as a result of the impact of COVID 19; however,
expected that this could be dealt with within the foster care systems, as most
additional care placements would be in foster care and not in residential care.
The report highlighted
that Welsh Government funding was being made available for the period July to
March, to increase the hourly rate paid (by £1 per hour) to providers of
domiciliary care who were experiencing additional costs due to the pandemic; it
was asked whether increase in pay was just for the external providers. It was
noted that Welsh Government had made various packages of additional funding
available to residential and home care; in terms of the home care, the £1 pay
increase was for the external providers, however the Council would be
reimbursed £1 for both external and internal providers, therefore the in-house
services would also be benefiting from this.
The Communication and
Marketing overspend was stated to be at £26k due to additional costs incurred
from the impact COVID 19, such as signage, banners; Welsh Government had only
funded 25% of costs and Members mentioned that this percentage was
disappointing. Officers mentioned that Welsh Government had provided a
significant amount of financial support as highlighted in the report, however
in some instances they had said they were not going to be covering all costs as
they believed that some of the Councils base budgets and overall contingencies
and resources should contribute towards particular overspends.
Members were informed
that the Community Care Management had a £78k underspend, which was largely due
to a reduction in the number of payments made to external assessors for
Deprivation of Liberty (DOLS) assessments; it was asked whether the rules for
these applications had changed or if individuals had been missed out in this
context, as the understand was quite significant. It was highlighted that this
wasn’t the case and that the number of DOLS assessments being carried out had
been impacted by COVID 19, which was reflected in the underspend; Officers
confirmed they would find out the detail of the waiting list for these
assessment and provide Members with the information accordingly.
Following scrutiny, the
committee was supportive of the proposals to be considered by Cabinet.
Draft Budget for
Consultation 2021/22
The Draft Budget for
Consultation 2021/22 was presented to Members which included draft budget
proposals, financial savings, service reductions and income generation
proposals; subject to Cabinet approval, it was proposed that the consultation
would take place following the meeting and last up to 12 February 2021.
The Chair highlighted
that the individual Scrutiny Committees would be given the opportunity to
scrutinise areas of the draft budget, within their remits, in more detail in
their upcoming meetings.
It was stated that the
proposals included in the report took into account the Provisional Local
Government Settlement that was announced by Welsh Government in the lead up to
Christmas. Officers mentioned that the report proposed to set a budget of £317m
which was inclusive of using £3.1m reserves, going to consult on 3.75% council
tax increase and investment proposals of around £7.7m on top of inflation,
mainly to deliver on the increase in demand for services for the next financial
year; there will be further work needed in respect of future financial years,
once COVID 19 was no longer a challenge and the UK Government had carried out
their spending reviews, giving indicative funding levels into subsequent
financial years.
Neath Port Talbot’s
provisional settlement was noted to be sixth out of the 22 Local Authorities in
terms of revised budget share from Welsh Government, however Neath Port Talbot
continually had either the second or third highest council tax rates in Wales,
with a proposed increase of 3.75% for the next financial year; Members asked
how was this being justified by Welsh Government. Officers confirmed that Welsh
Government had given a general settlement increase of 3.8% across the whole of
Wales; Neath Port Talbot’s increase was better than the average, at 4.2%. It was
highlighted that one of the major drivers of the formula, to distribute the
£4.6billion across all 22 Local Authorities in Wales, was population;
population in Neath Port Talbot had slightly improved compared to the all Wales
position which was one of the major changes and reasons why some Local
Authorities had benefited more than others.
Members asked if Welsh
Government could be influenced to change the standard spending assessment as
part of the final settlement as it currently did not meet the needs of some
Councils. It was noted that this was something that could be looked into for
future years; to be able to have better influence and opportunities to obtain
better resources. It was mentioned that it would not be beneficial for anyone
to try and do this between now and the final settlement for this financial year.
Officers were asked to
provide comment on the patterns of reserves reflected in the figures provided
by the Director of Finance and Corporate Services.
Financial Year |
Closing
General Reserve |
General
Reserve as % of Budget |
2018/19 |
£20.9m |
7.4% |
2019/20 |
£19.9m |
6.9% |
2020/21
(forecast) |
£14.6m |
4.8% |
2020/21 (draft
budget) |
£12m |
3.8% |
It was explained that
the original forecast for the end of this financial year (2020/21) was impacted
by COVID 19; the new forecast was detailed in the table above. The report noted
some of the prudent measures the Council had adopted in recent years, plus the
significant council tax collection rates that were achieved; the Council had
been achieving between 97.9% - 98% collection rates in previous years, which
had boosted the amount of monies that were held in the general reserves. It was
added that this had helped put the Council in a better positon this year to be
able to propose, as part of draft budget, to use a further £3.1m for the next
financial year to enable the Council to be in a better financial positon for
2022/23, when further considerations were taken into account in the budget
setting process around what was affordable and the priorities of the Council.
It was asked if the
actual wording of the consultation, which was going out to the public to
respond, could be shared with Members. Officers agreed to circulate the wording
to Members and highlighted that it would also be uploaded onto the Councils
website. Members were provided with the following information in relation to
the aim of the consultation, which was a Council budget setting process for
2021/22 questionnaire, and the types of issues it was going to raise:
·
Confirms that the Council’s gross investment in Council Services was
around £445m, and that there was a £3.2m gap in order to face the budget next
year
·
References and links to the report circulated to the Committee (Draft
Budget for Consultation 2021/22)
·
Highlights the facts that the Council was consulting on using £3.1m of
general reserves, increasing council tax by 3.75% and using measures of savings
an income generation already approved by Council last year (135k to be used)
·
Provides indication of what an increase of 3.75% in council tax is and
asks the public for their views around the increase
·
Explains general reserves and gives examples of what is meant by general
reserves and the potential use of the £3.1m
·
Asks for any suggestions on ways the Council could generate income or save
money.
·
Asks if there were any Council Services that individuals think should be
protected, reduced and/or stopped altogether
·
Asks questions in relation to the £7.7m worth of investments the Council
were making and if the public agreed with them
It was added that the
consultation this year would be slightly different due to COVID 19; the Council
would be encouraging through social media platforms and other measures for the
public to consult and respond to this consultation.
It was asked if the
proposed 3.75% increase in council tax could be reconsidered after the
consultation had concluded, due to the significant financial impact that COVID
19 has had on the public. It was stated that all Members were included in the
budget setting and were encouraged to get involved in this process by promoting
the consultation to their communities to take part and submitting information
in regards to suggestions and ideas in altering, changing or improving the
budget.
Members were informed
that the proposed 3.75% increase in council tax was lower than the council tax
set for the current financial year and the Council were doing their upmost in
appreciating those businesses and individuals affected by COVD 19; the Council
had paid £32m so far in relation to business grants since the outbreak of the
virus. It was added that there were no cuts proposed in the budget and one of
the priorities was improving settlements within individual departments; it was
the first time the Council had taken a significant amount of money out of
reserves in order to compensate for the unjust settlements that had been in
place for some time.
A discussion took place
in relation to the reserves and if there were any implications based on what
was proposed. Officers stated that the predicted reserves for the end of this
year was £14.6m (4.8%) and should the Council be provided with additional
income loss refunds from Welsh Government, that position may improve; the
Council had recently been asked to prepare a loss of income claim for the
quarter which ended in December and there were indications that a further claim
could be made for this next coming quarter. It was noted that the external
auditors will want to see the Councils plans for a sustainable budget going
forward from 2022/23; the UK Government hadn’t announced their spending review
for funding levels beyond 2022, that information would hopefully be available
late summer/early autumn and work will be carried out by Officers and the
Cabinet over the summer to try and develop strategies to have balanced budgets
form 2022/23 onwards. Officers added that they were not expecting any
challenges from auditors based on the proposals the Council was putting in
front of Cabinet and the public, as part of the consultation process. It was
highlighted that previously, external auditors and other had stated that
anywhere in the region of 3-5% was appropriate for Councils to have, and at
around 3.8% predicted by the end of next year meant that Neath Port Talbot
Council were within that appropriate level; however, additional work needed to
be carried out imminently for 2022/23 as the Council couldn’t continue to take
£3.1m reserves out year on year.
The Committee thanked
all of the staff in Finance Services for their work throughout the COVID 19
pandemic.
Following scrutiny, the
committee was supportive of the proposals to be considered by Cabinet