Report
of the Assistant Chief Executive and Chief Digital Officer enclosed.
Minutes:
Council
received the Joint Report of the Chief Executive and the Assistant Chief
Executive and Chief Digital Officer in relation to the proposed changes to
electoral divisions and ward boundaries for submission to the Local Democracy and
Boundary Commission for Wales.
Following
an introduction by the Leader of Council, Members raised the following issues:
o
That valley areas had a high level of deprivation and as a result would
require increased representation not less;
o
Concern was expressed that the identities of communities particularly in
valley areas would be lost and called on Ministers not to disproportionally
disadvantage such areas particularly while Local Government Reform was still a
possibility;
o
the Local Member generally agreed with the amalgamation of Lower
Brynamman and Gwaun Cae Gurwen;
o
the natural connection between Dyffryn Clydach and Coedffranc North was
highlighted;
o
that another way of strengthening the numbers in Trebanos should be
explored other than joining with Pontardawe;
o
there had been an increase in population in both Coedffranc West and
Dyffryn Clydach and that the number of Members should therefore not be reduced;
o
Dyffryn Clydach was an established community of its own while Bryncoch
was part of the Blaenhonddan Community Council area;
o
Although Cwmllynfell was recognised in its own right there was more of a
connection with Ystalyfera than the Amman Valley;
o
Glynneath and Cwmgwrach the proposed changes were not supported by the
Local Member;
o
Pelenna had its own Community Council whilst the report proposes to
split the Ward and merge the areas with the Bryn and Cwmavon and Cimla Wards. It
was suggested that the Pelenna Community Council wanted the Ward to be retained
as a Ward in its own right, however, if change was necessary the Community
Council preference was for the whole of the Ward to be amalgamated with Cimla;
o
the Local Member expressed concern that the projected figures for Coed
Darcy were incorrect;
o
Concern was expressed that the Council was not consulting with community
councils/residents – it was pointed out that this was not the Council’s
consultation exercise but a response from the Council to consultation being
carried out by the Local Democracy and Boundary Commission for Wales at an
early stage of the review process;
o
There was an inconsistency around the views of the Independent
Remuneration Panel for Wales, which had recognised the increased workload of councillors
in its recent draft Annual Report, and the views expressed by the Local
Democracy and Boundary Commission for Wales which was proposing an increase in
Councillor : elector ration.
Following
the above comments the Leader of Council advised Council that to do nothing was
not an option and that the number of residents in the valley areas was
declining. Thirteen Councils in Wales
had already gone through a similar exercise.
Prior
to the vote on the following amendment taking place a recorded vote was
requested and supported by one sixth of the Members present:-
‘This Council appreciates the work undertaken by
Officers to analyse the potential response to the Boundary Commission.
However,
we are very concerned that
The boundary reviews are a distraction when the major
issues of Local Government Reorganisation and Council budget cuts are
unresolved.
The workload of Councillors has increased in the age of
austerity
The current proposals will significantly disadvantage our
valley areas at a time when Welsh Government and NPT CBC are developing valley
strategies.
Some of the proposals would cut across communities or
amalgamate wards that are not naturally part of the same settlements.
The Boundary Commission have erred in their assumption that
the total number of wards in NPT should be reduced given growth areas.
We
note that individual communities and members will also make representations to
the commission relevant to their own areas during the consultation.
This
Council will inform the Commission and the Minister that the basis of the
review is flawed and that any formal consultation should be based on
maintaining the current number of Councillors in NPT.
Members voting for the
Amendment
Cllrs.
S.Bamsey, H.C.Clarke, R.Davies, C.Edwards, J.Evans, W.F.Griffiths, J.Hale,
N.T.Hunt, S.K.Hunt, H.Jones, J.Jones, S.A.Knoyle, A.Llewelyn, J.D.Morgan,
D.M.Peters, R.Phillips, L.M.Purcell, A.J.Richards and C.Williams.
Members voting against the
Amendment
Cllrs.
A.R.Aubrey, D.Cawsey, C.Clement-Williams, S. ap Dayfdd, D.W.Davies, O.S.Davies,
S.E.Freeguard, C.Galsworthy, M.Harvey, C.James, H.N.James, C.J.Jones,
L.C.Jones, R.G.Jones, E.V.Latham, A.R.Lockyer, A.McGrath, J.Miller, S.Miller,
R.Mizen, S.Paddison, S.M.Penry, M.Protheroe, S.M.Pursey, S.Rahaman, P.A.Rees,
S.Renkes, S.H.Reynolds, A.J.Taylor, A.L.Thomas, J.Warman, D.Whitelock, R.W.Wood
and A.N.Woolcock
Members Abstentions
Cllrs.
S.Jones and D.Keogh
The
motion fell and Members then voted on the substantive motion, as contained in
the circulated report, as follows:-
Members voting for the
Substantive Motion
Cllrs.
A.R.Aubrey, D.Cawsey, C.Clement-Williams, S. ap Dayfdd, D.W.Davies, O.S.Davies,
S.E.Freeguard, C.Galsworthy, M.Harvey, C.James, H.N.James, C.J.Jones, L.C.Jones,
R.G.Jones, E.V.Latham, A.R.Lockyer, A.McGrath, J.Miller, S.Miller, R.Mizen,
S.Paddison, S.M.Penry, M.Protheroe, S.M.Pursey, S.Rahaman, P.A.Rees, S.Renkes,
S.H.Reynolds, A.J.Taylor, A.L.Thomas, J.Warman, D.Whitelock and R.W.Wood
Members voting against the
Substantive Motion
Cllrs.
S.Bamsey, H.C.Clarke, R.Davies, C.Edwards, J.Evans, W.F.Griffiths, J.Hale,
N.T.Hunt, S.K.Hunt, H.Jones, J.Jones, S.A.Knoyle, A.Llewelyn, J.D.Morgan,
D.M.Peters, R.Phillips, L.M.Purcell, A.J.Richards and C.Williams.
Members Abstentions
Cllrs.
S.Jones, D.Keogh and A.N.Woolcock
RESOLVED: That the Chief
Executive be authorised to immediately submit the preferred option, as
contained in the circulated report, to the Local Democracy and Boundary
Commission for Wales.
Supporting documents: