Minutes:
As
part of the public consultation on the budget proposals, Committee considered
the report of the Director of Environment, as they related to the Streetscene and Engineering Scrutiny Committee. Members then raised the following points:-
·
ENV 802 - Members asked for clarity around the proposed saving of £200k
in relation to the tendering of the contractual arrangements for the MREC. Officers advised that current arrangements
were related in large part to the failed Private Finance Initiative Contract
and at present involved a lump sum payment for treatment of residual waste. The potential new contract would move to a
cost per tonne basis, including defined income for recyclate,
and the tendered rates being considered indicated the savings included in the
FFP would be achieved.
·
Concern was expressed at the
proposed 100% increase in the parking charges at the Gnoll
Country Park, and would this result in less people visiting the Park or more on
street parking? Members also asked for
details of the disabled concessions.
Officers advised that the proposed increase at the Gnoll
Country Park was not aimed at making a profit but at reducing the subsidy at
present paid by the Authority. In
addition Members noted that more accessible parking bays were designated for
disabled blue badge holders. With regard
to the increase in off street parking, Members noted that a Traffic Regulation
Order would be implemented prior to 31 March 2018 to address this.
·
ENV 803 - Members asked whether there had been discussions with Powys
County Council in relation to the proposals re the Pwllfawatkin
Household Waste Recycling Centre and Powys’ facility at Lower Cwmtwch and were advised that negotiations were ongoing and
that perhaps only one of the sites might be used going forward.
·
In relation to the £52 yearly pass which can be bought for each of the
Country Park sites, Members asked whether payment could be made on a monthly
basis. Officers advised that the
administration of this would be prohibitive.
·
Members suggested that there be 2 tiers of charges: one for the tourist
areas (which would encourage tourism) and the other for all remaining
areas? Officers responded that this would
be unmanageable. Consistency was an
issue throughout the County Borough, however in order to draw up the proposals
the particular facilities were considered.
·
The cost of buses parking at the Country Parks was raised, wherein it
was noted that all vehicles paid the same tariff (the cost at Margam Park would
have to be verified after the meeting) - this could be reviewed moving
forward.
·
Members asked what posts the staff savings of £30k referred to and were
advised that it was believed to be a post in the Planning Section, but all
applications for ER/VR were being considered with respect to potential
efficiencies.
·
In relation to the Seafront Strategy, it was noted that the relevant
Ward Members were supportive of the proposals contained in the circulated
report.
·
In relation to the increase in charges, Members noted that this also
referred to Pontardawe. Some Members expressed
concern that this may reduce the footfall or that the public may find
alternative parking, perhaps on street.
Officers advised that, in line with the National Guidelines, Pontardawe was deemed a town and that the same tariff was
proposed as both Neath and Port Talbot. It was also noted that vandals had damaged
the machine in Pontardawe on several occasions, and
that the Police would be investigating the incidents. The proposals were subject to consultation
and the final decision would be made by Members in the New Year.
·
Members discussed the implementation of digital/virtual residents’
parking permits and noted that there would be a £2.50 administration
charge. In order to ‘police’ this a Mobile Enforcement Van would scan number plates and
Officers could issue penalty notices.
Clarification was also given on the issuing of holiday/ visitors’
permits.
·
Members noted that the charge for Staff and Member permits would be the
subject of a separate report to the Personnel Committee.
·
Members were please at the proposed introduction of the mobile CCTV van
and its use outside schools. Officers
advised that checks would be made to ensure that the correct Traffic Orders
were in place and thereafter the mobile unit would patrol outside of schools to
ensure compliance with the Orders. This
would generate income for the Authority which could be used to offset such
things as the purchase and training associated with the new service and
increases in NNDR in 2018.
Supporting documents: