Minutes:
The
Committee received supplementary information concerning the savings proposals
for the Social Services Budget, set out in the Cabinet Report of 28 September
2016, as detailed within the circulated report.
Members
were provided with the background to the Council’s Forward Financial Plan
proposals up to March 2020. It was explained that the Children and Young People
Services budget forms part of the broader Social Services budget, which had
large savings to be made. It was noted that there had been significant
investment into early intervention and preventative work that should result in some
savings happening organically. It was highlighted that there were no new
savings proposals for 2017/18 for Children and Young People Services and remained
SSHH 540 – Savings arising from ongoing reductions in looked After Children. It
was noted that if austerity measures continued then the scope for identifying
savings in Children’s Services was limited.
It
was explained that the four main areas of expenditure in the Service were staff
costs, operational, Looked After Children and Leaving
Care. It was highlighted that a lot of resources had been spent on ensuring
that the structure and stability of the workforce was right. The support
services were also important to ensure that the Service ran effectively and it
would not be of benefit to make cuts in these areas. It was identified that the
area where savings could be made was by safely reducing the number of Looked After Children.
Officers
highlighted that the number of Looked After Children
had been significantly reduced last financial year and the Service was on track
to reach its target for this year. It was proposed that for 2017/18 to further
reduce the number of Looked After Children by 23. Officers
explained that the savings made would also depend on the placement type as some
placements were more expensive than others, for example foster carers for
teenagers were paid at a higher rate. It was noted that there were 10 children
placed in residential accommodation and the Service would be looking at
rehabilitating them back into specialist foster care. It was highlighted that
as the Service progresses and there were lower numbers of Looked After Children then it would be more difficult to find future
savings.
Members
noted that out of county placements were very expensive,
however, some concern was expressed about whether or not the needs of those
children and young people would be met in county. Officers explained that the
children who were in settled placements would not be brought back,
efforts would be focussed on those that were not in stable placements and where
the Service was confident that their needs could be met.
Members
highlighted that all areas were struggling with financial cuts and asked what
potential future areas could contribute to the Forward Financial Plan. Officers
noted that in slicing parts of Services there was a risk that they could go
wrong and it had to be ensured that the numbers of Looked After
Children did not start to increase. Therefore cross directorate savings would
need to be considered. It was highlighted that Adult and Children’s Services
had been working more closely together and this had been a benefit of having
the same head of service covering both areas for an interim period. An example
was given of improvements in the transition of young people from Children’s to
Adult Services.
Members
asked about potential changes to Complex Needs Services. It was noted that this
area of work was specific to Adult Social Care and it was a difficult area to
target. Future reports would be brought to the relevant Committee regarding
this.
The
Committee queried the figures for 2017/18 in the table outlining the funding
gap as they did not seem to add up. Officers noted that it was a corporate
table and would query this with the Finance Section and circulate a response to
Members. The Committee also asked what the one off budget allocation to Streetscene was. Officers explained that the Streetscene section came under the Environment Directorate
and due to the budget settlement last year being better than expected a one off
contribution had been allocated to them.
Members
noted that under workforce impacts the report referred to trade unions and
staff briefings and asked if this was in regards to the Early Retirement and
Voluntary Redundancy Scheme. Officers explained that it was not in reference to
this scheme as Children and Young People Services were not accepting requests
under this scheme to ensure workforce stability. It was highlighted that trade
unions were involved in the corporate discussions regarding the Forward
Financial Plan.
Members
asked if the Welsh Government settlement for the Council was better than
expected would the same savings be made. It was highlighted that it would be up
to Council to make that decision, however, the proposals put forward by
Children and Young People Services were also the best options for the Service.
The
Cabinet Member for Children and Young people thanked the Senior Management of
the Service for meeting the savings previously identified and was confident
that the challenges would be met going forward.
Following
scrutiny, it was agreed that the report be noted.
Supporting documents: