Minutes:
The
Committee scrutinised the following matters:
Cabinet
Board Proposals
3.1
Planning Business Plan 2016-17
The
Committee received the Planning Business Plan 2016-17 as contained within the
circulated report.
Members
from the Environment and Highways Scrutiny Committee were welcomed to the
Committee for joint scrutiny of this item which crosses the remits of both the
Environment and Highways and Economic and Community Regeneration Scrutiny
Committees.
Members
were informed that the service now incorporates Planning and Public Protection
and a major achievement had been the inclusion of Environmental Health and
Trading Standards into the Planning Department.
Members
praised the successful completion of the 13 week public examination of the LDP
(Local Development Plan) as well as the number of appeals against planning
applications which had been upheld and the number of complaints dealt with
within 48 hours.
Members
noted a trend in the business plan relating to ‘doing more with less’ and that
as resources decrease it is inevitable that performance will suffer. Members
continued to note the increase in the amount of legislation being created by
Welsh Government with no additional resources accompanying it to allow for the
work to be completed. Members also expressed concern at monetary penalties
being imposed if set timescales for planning applications were not met which
was putting extra pressure on the service and its staff.
The
Committee queried how staff are kept updated of changes to legislation and
expressed concern in particular for part time workers with whom it can
sometimes be difficult to get issues resolved. Officers shared the concern and
committed to looking into how certain issues in relation to part time workers
could be resolved.
Members
queried if the situation at TATA Steel would have any effect on the East Pit
site. Officers confirmed that although a small amount of business is conducted
with TATA Steel it is not their main
customer and the uncertain future of TATA
should have no real impact on East Pit.
Further
information was sought on the collaboration proposed for the Fabian Way area
and Members were pleased to note the wide area that the planned proposal
encompasses and looked forward to receiving more information via a SPG to this
Committee.
Members
requested a staff directory be produced now that Environmental Health and
Trading Standards had joined the Department and a re-structure has taken place
and suggested a Member Training Event may also be useful.
Members
discussed the issue of abandoned properties across the County Borough and asked
for an update on the proposed ‘triage’ service in relation to this. Officers
explained the ‘triage’ was still in early development stages with the aim of
reducing the number of officers having to be involved with investigating sites
by getting groups of officers together in the early stages of the process to
discuss and agree enforcement options. Members looked forward to an update on
the approach as it is progressed.
Following
scrutiny the report was noted with the Committee noting the ongoing performance
of the service against the business plan be a priority.
3.2 Neath Port Talbot Local
Development Plan (LDP)- Consideration of
the Parking Standards Consultation Draft Supplementary Planning Guidance; the
Pollution Consultation Draft Supplementary Planning Guidance and the
publication/consultation procedures to be implemented.
The
Committee received the Consultation Draft Parking Standards and Pollution
Supplementary Planning Guidance (SPG) as contained within the circulated
report.
The
draft parking standards SPG supplements LDP Strategic Policy SP20 (Transport
Network) and Policy TR2 (Design and Access of New Development) and Members were
informed about the standards that will need to be achieved in respect of
parking provision across Neath Port Talbot.
The
draft Pollution SPG supplements LDP Strategic Policy SP16 (Environmental
Protection), Policy EN8 (Pollution and Land Stability) Policy EN9 (Developments
in the Central Port Talbot Area) and Policy EN10 (Quiet Areas). Members were
informed about the relevant matters which will need to be taken into account
when developments are being planned.
Members
noted the level of detail included in the report and praised all those involved
in the work undertaken.
A
query was raised in relation to home environment juxtaposed against parking
criteria. An example was cited of having very good parking arrangements but
living in cramped plots with very limited outside space and it was queried if
developers are provided with minimum standards in relation to the home
environment. Officers explained that this detail in included within the
‘Design’ SPG and agreed that all future developments need to be sustainable.
Members
asked if rural and urban areas are taken into account when considering parking
standards and were informed that Zones and Thresholds are indeed included
taking this into account.
Members
noted that for cost efficiency reasons batches of SPGs will be published for
consultation and the first will relate to 5 key strategic SPGs. Members looked
forward to receiving subsequent SPGs in relation to Planning obligations,
Affordable Housing and Baglan Bay Development
Framework and noted that responses to the consultation would be brought back to
this Committee.
Following
scrutiny, the Committee were supportive of the proposals to be considered by
Cabinet Board.