Minutes:
Officers
made a presentation to the Planning Committee on this Application as detailed
within the circulated report.
In
accordance with the Council’s Public Speaking Protocol, Mr. K. Jones (Objector)
and Mr.R.Gordon (Applicant – Right of Reply),
addressed the Committee.
The
Local Ward Members also addressed the Committee engaging in detailed
discussions with Officers and Members.
RESOLVED: |
That
contrary to the Officer recommendation as detailed within the circulated
report, the Application be refused for the following reason: Reason By
virtue of its scale, elevation and proximity to residential properties, the
proposed fence would have an adverse visual impact, contrary to Policy BE1 of
the adopted Local Development Plan. |
(Note:
With regard to the Amendment Sheet
referred to above and attached as an Appendix, on which the Chair had allowed
sufficient time for Members to read, in respect of application items on the
published agenda, the Chairman had permitted urgent circulation/consideration
thereof at today’s meeting, the particular reasons and the circumstances being
not to further delay the planning process, unless the Committee itself wanted
to defer any applications and to ensure that Members take all extra relevant
information into account before coming to any decision at the meeting).
Supporting documents: