Venue: Multi-Location Meeting - Presentation room, Port Talbot Civic Centre & Microsoft Teams
| No. | Item |
|---|---|
|
Chairs Announcements Decision: The
Chair welcomed everyone to the meeting. Minutes: The
Chair welcomed everyone to the meeting. |
|
|
Declarations of Interest Decision: There
were none. Minutes: There
were none. |
|
|
To Consider Items from the Cabinet Forward Work Programme Decision: There
were no Items selected from the Cabinet Forward Work Programme. Minutes: There
were no Items selected from the Cabinet Forward Work Programme. |
|
|
To Consider Items from the Scrutiny Forward Work Programme Decision: Members
considered item 4a from the Scrutiny Forward Work Programme. Minutes: Members
considered item 4a from the Scrutiny Forward Work Programme. |
|
|
Levelling Up Fund Verbal Update Decision: Following
Scrutiny the update was noted. Minutes: Simon Brennan
Head of Property and Regeneration presented an update on the Levelling up fund
projects with the assistance of Chris Saunders Head of Leisure Tourism History
and Culture. Members were
advised that there are three Levelling Up Fund (LUF) Projects. 1 The Vale of Neath Heritage Corridor Visitor Attractor which is a
package bid in the Vale of Neath, which will deliver two transformational
projects: · The Gnoll Estate Country Park Heritage and Visitor Infrastructure will
invest in the historic estate; visitor offer and establish visitor
accommodation in the park. · The Waterfall Country Pontneddfechan visitor infrastructure scheme will
deliver strategic visitor infrastructure including family friendly
accommodation and improved parking. 2 Port Talbot Town Centre Regeneration project will support the
regeneration and economic recovery of Port Talbot Town Centre. 3 Newbridge Road Bridge – reopening of Newbridge Bridge, along with
improvements to adjoining linkages on Newbridge Road (west) and Riverside Road
(east) in the form of a shared pedestrian and cycle track alongside the
carriageway. Members were
advised that the Newbridge Road Bridge project is only at the design stage and
as a result the council has only been given a limited amount of funding for it
but is being progressed by officers. In
relation to the Gnoll scheme, members were advised that it is progressing well. Officers
noted public questions about progressing the new visitor centre, with some
feeling the old one was sufficient. However, officers believe the new centre
offers a significantly improved, more engaging, and sustainable experience for
visitors. Members
were advised that most parks and facilities require a small subsidy, partly due
to limited secondary spend as many facilities are outdated or don't meet
current needs. Officers believe the new offer could improve sustainability
going forward. Officers
explained that the project is split into several sections, improving the
visitor offer and consolidating the key heritage features. Officers
advised there had been extensive discussions around potential features. Members
were informed that elements not included in the current phase may be considered
in future phases, as supporting infrastructure would make them more viable
later. Officers
are looking at developing the children’s play offer as a key part of getting
people into the park. Members
were advised that the council needs to improve interpretation within the park
to help visitors understand its history, purpose, and available facilities. Officers
highlighted the refurbishment of Pond Cottage to create the five-star
self-catering holiday cottage and hoped that it will be popular going forward. Officers advised
that the new adventure park and additional facilities for older children are
funded through the Levelling Up Fund. The smaller park near the visitor centre
will remain unchanged for now, but there are plans to redevelop it in the
future. This will depend on the availability of Section 106 funding and the
commencement of certain schemes, although a ready-to-go plan is already in
place. Officers felt that the Gnoll is making good progress, and they hope to be complete by September 2025. They also confirmed that the visitor ... view the full minutes text for item 4a |
|
|
Performance Monitoring Decision: Members Considered performance monitoring item 5 a & b. |
|
|
Additional documents:
Minutes: Members felt
that aligning business plans with the overall strategy improves clarity. However,
they were concerned that dividing responsibilities may hinder
cross-departmental collaboration. They recalled previous commitments to improve
this and asked how it's being implemented, noting that one business plan
referenced the issue. Members noted
inconsistencies between Leisure & Culture’s business plans (within the
Education directorate) and those of Environmental Services. They highlighted
that the former lacks cross-cutting goals and shared objectives, making
comparison and monitoring difficult. Members asked
whether this is still an ongoing process and emphasised that business plans are
a valuable tool for committee oversight and future monitoring. Members
noted that under the “What didn’t work well” section of the plans, it would be
helpful to include a narrative explaining what happened, what didn’t work, and
the overall impact going forward. They felt this would provide clearer context
and support better understanding and monitoring. Nicola Pearce, Director for Environment and
Regeneration advised that Environment services followed a corporate business
plan template, which was flexible for services to adapt if needed. Some
sections, such as budget targets and savings, were pre-populated by colleagues
in Finance and Corporate Services. Louise McAndrew was specifically noted for
her helpful contributions, demonstrating an example of effective
cross-departmental collaboration. Officers
explained that they followed that template to ensure that had a consistent
approach within the directorate. Members were
informed that each business plan includes a section on the sustainable
development principle, with columns addressing the five ways of working.
Officers explained their position on each and provided examples, noting these
are illustrative rather than exhaustive examples of collaboration. Examples of
collaboration included: Property and
Regeneration: Worked on the Tata Steel transition with third sector
organisations, UK and Welsh Governments, businesses, and the private sector. Engineering and
Transport: Referenced coal tip safety work in partnership with the Mine
Remediation Authority. NPT was a pilot authority, helping develop the
inspection system that led to £180 million in funding for Wales, this funding
supports monitoring and response to coal tip issues in the local area. Officers
acknowledged they can't deliver everything alone and regularly collaborate with
the private sector, government departments, academia, and the third sector. They cited
recruitment challenges in Building Control as an area that hasn’t worked well.
Succession plans are in place across the directorate, and officers are working
with the Future of Work team in People and Organisational Services to improve
recruitment. While there have
been successes, significant challenges remain in filling roles such as
surveyors, architects, project managers, and engineers. Members were
informed that a surveyor post had been advertised three times with no
applications. Building Control is now restructuring and exploring alternative
approaches. Apprentices are in place, with the aim of developing in-house
talent. While this won’t solve immediate recruitment issues, it’s a long-term
strategy to address future needs. Members asked
whether staffing issues in Building Control were causing delays. Officers
confirmed the service is behind due to recruitment challenges. While members praised collaboration with external partners, they also asked ... view the full minutes text for item 5a |
|
|
Supplement - Leisure Tourism Heritage & Culture Business Plans Additional documents:
Decision: Following
Scrutiny the report was noted. Minutes: Following
Scrutiny the report was noted. |
|
|
Selection of Items for Future Scrutiny Additional documents: Decision: Following
Scrutiny the report was noted. Minutes: Following
Scrutiny the report was noted. |
|
|
Urgent Items Decision: There
were none Minutes: There
were none |