Venue: Multi-Location Meeting - Council Chamber, Port Talbot & Microsoft Teams. View directions
Contact: Pamela Chivers - Scrutiny Officer Email: p.chivers@npt.gov.uk
No. | Item |
---|---|
Chair's Announcements Decision: The
Chair welcomed everyone to the meeting. Minutes: The
Chair welcomed everyone to the meeting. |
|
Declarations of Interest Decision: There were no declarations of interest received. Minutes: There were no declarations of interest received. |
|
To Consider items from the Cabinet Forward Work Programme Decision: Members
considered items from the Cabinet Forward Work Programme. Minutes: Members
considered items from the Cabinet Forward Work Programme. |
|
Play Sufficiency Assessment 2025 - 2028 Additional documents:
Decision: Following
scrutiny, members supported the recommendation in the draft Cabinet report. Minutes: Officers
provided an overview of the report as contained within the agenda pack. Members
complimented officers on the work undertaken in this area. Members
referred to the reference in the report of ‘lighting to make children feel more
secure and safe and clean green spaces.’ Members questioned what interaction
was taken between directorates; other directorates are proposing a reduction in
street lighting and park gates have been left open, which has resulted in
reports of antisocial behaviour and more littering in those areas. Officers
confirmed that the Play Strategic Implementation Group contained members from
other directorates within the authority, such as planning and neighbourhood
services. Work is undertaken by the group to address these issues. Members
enquired whether the authority engaged with grassroots sports clubs and
commented that there are many qualified volunteers who could assist in
providing play opportunities for children. Officers
confirmed that work is undertaken with third sector organisations but there is
more work to do over the next three years. During the consultation period,
third sector organisations were relied on to make connections with local sports
clubs and this link can be explored further. Young people have communicated
that they would like more access to football in parks as well as through sports
clubs. Through the Communication plan, parents will be advised of what is
available in their local area. Members
commented that some local facilities need improvements. Officers
stated that the Local Authority Grants Officer, works closely with Town and
Community Councils, to support organisations to apply for grants to enable
facilities to be improved. Members
commented that play opportunities for children and young people were vital. Members
enquired whether any consideration had been given regarding the visibility of
the Welsh language in relation to signage in parks. The visibility of the Welsh
language is important particularly for Welsh speaking children and young
people; more could be done to promote the Welsh language through play. Officers
agreed that Welsh speaking children and young people wanted information to be
communicated to them within their own first language. This is something that
will be raised and taken forward. Members
referred to page 36 of the report and the mention that there was no
representative of the Play Sufficiency Implementation Group on the West
Glamorgan Regional Partnership Board. Officers
advised members that there had been no call for this previously. This is the
first year within the assessment toolkit, that the Welsh Government has asked
this question. Representation on the Regional Partnership Board will be
explored. Members
asked if any concern was held over a lack of play opportunities for children
and young people in rural areas. Is there any inequality in attendance at after
school clubs due to children and young people living in rural areas and the
lack of public transport? Officers confirmed that after school clubs would fall under the remit of the Childcare Sufficiency Assessments so this would not have been considered in depth, as part of the Play Sufficiency Assessment. The team responsible ... view the full minutes text for item 3a |
|
To consider items from the Scrutiny Committee Forward Work Programme ·
There are no items to consider from the Scrutiny Committee Forward Work Programme. Decision: There were no items to consider from the Scrutiny Committee
Forward Work Programme. Minutes: There were no items to consider from the Scrutiny Committee
Forward Work Programme. |
|
Performance Monitoring Decision: Members considered the Performance Monitoring item. Minutes: Members considered the Performance Monitoring item. |
|
Education, Leisure and Lifelong Learning Service Improvement Plans Service Improvement Plans ·
Education Development ·
Child and Family Support Team ·
Early Years and Partnerships Service ·
Inclusion Service ·
Employability, Skills and Poverty ·
Education Support Services ·
Transformation (Strategic School Improvement Programme and Welsh in
Education Strategic Plan) Additional documents:
Decision: Following
scrutiny, the report was noted. Minutes: The
Head of Education Development advised members that there are seven Service
Improvement Plans that sit below three of the four Heads of Service in Education,
Leisure and Lifelong Learning. The plans will be updated annually in line with
the ESTYN recommendations and the revised Corporate Strategy Plan 2025-2028. Members
enquired how regularly the committee would receive updates on the Service
Improvement Plans. The
Head of Service advised members it is likely that Service Improvement Plans
will move towards Business Plans, to align with other directorates. Time needs
to be given to align the plans with the Corporate Strategy and Estyn Inspection
recommendations. Work will be undertaken with the Chair and Democratic Services
to identify an appropriate timescale for updates. Members can request the
information at any time, but it was noted that some of the information may not
be available on a quarterly basis and most of the improvement plans will need
at least an annual approach to achieve any actions within them and performance
monitoring. Members
noted the reliance on grants to fund certain posts and enquired whether the
authority was in a position to know how stable the grants are and whether they
will continue in the same form. The
Head of Education Development advised members that grants, by their nature were
unreliable. It is not anticipated that Welsh Government will remove grants due
to the nature of the improvements that are being worked on. But there are no
certainties that grants would continue. Officers
provided an example to members; in one team, confirmation of the continuation
of grants was not provided by Welsh Government until four weeks before the
staff contracts were due to expire. This provides difficulties for staff. Members
requested that any changes expected in grants be communicated to scrutiny
committee as soon as possible? Members
referred to page 80 of the report and the mention of the home education team
collating information and formal feedback from parents on the level of support that they are receiving.
Members enquired whether any initial information was available in relation to
the feedback collated. The
Head of Education Development confirmed that a full report would be brought to
the committee as specified on the Forward Work Programme. Officers
confirmed that the feedback was collated from parents on an ongoing basis. The
report being brought to committee will contain the most recent updates relating
to parent feedback. Officers confirmed that parents do not have to engage and
provide feedback to the authority and there is no legal right for the authority
to physically see a child on a visit to a home schooled child. Members
acknowledged that budget pressures mentioned in the report can place an
additional burden on services. Is there a mitigation plan going forward to
address this. The
Head of Education Development, responded for his service area, that where
services are grant funded, any reduced funding stream could have an impact on
the service provided or redundancies. Members enquired whether there were sufficient plans in ... view the full minutes text for item 5a |
|
Selection of items for future scrutiny · Cabinet Forward Work
Programme · Scrutiny Committee Forward
Work Programme Additional documents: Decision: The
Forward Work Programme was noted. Minutes: Officers
referred to the Cabinet and Scrutiny Committee Forward Work Programmes
contained within the agenda pack, and members were given the opportunity to
request further items for consideration. Members
were advised that the School Funding Formula Review report has moved on the
Cabinet Forward Work Programme from the 26th of November to the 16th of
December Cabinet and this will enable the scrutiny committee to consider that
item for pre decision scrutiny on the 27th of November. In
agreement with the Chair, the following reports were added to the Scrutiny
Committee Forward Work Programme: • Pupil and Staff Wellbeing – 27th
November 2025 • Development of literacy in Neath Port
Talbot Schools - 8th January 2026 • Development of numeracy in Neath Port
Talbot Schools – 8th January 2026 • Additional Learning Needs Provision and
Progress – 19th February 2026 Members
discussed a previously proposed Strategic Schools Improvement Programme (SSIP)
Workshop. The
Head of Support Services and Transformation advised members that a report was
brought to Cabinet and Scrutiny Committee previously to ask Cabinet for
permission to submit the rolling program. A further report will be brought to
Cabinet possibly within six months to revise the programme due to rising
financial costs and the report will also be available for scrutiny. Members
requested sight of the SSIP Programme, and it was agreed that the previous
reports would be re-circulated. Members
agreed that a workshop would not be beneficial at this time due to the
forthcoming reports that can come to scrutiny committee. The
Forward Work Programme was noted. |
|
Urgent Items Any
urgent items at the discretion of the Chairperson pursuant to Section
100BA(6)(b) of the Local Government Act 1972 (as amended) Decision: There
were no urgent items. Minutes: There
were no urgent items. |