Venue: Multi-Location Meeting - Council Chamber, Port Talbot & Microsoft Teams. View directions
Contact: Charlotte John Email: c.l.john@npt.gov.uk
No. | Item |
---|---|
Chair's Announcements Decision: The
Chair welcomed everyone to the meeting. The
Chair noted that the Members of the Scrutiny Committee had agreed to scrutinise
the following items from the Cabinet Board agenda: · Item 7. Amendment to Byelaw
prohibiting cycling at Neath Memorial Gates and along the path between the
bottom pond and Cimla Crescent · Item 8. Public Space
Protection Orders - Aberavon Seafront · Item 9. Replacement Local
Development Plan (RLDP) - Revised Delivery Agreement (DA) · Item 10. Parking Review 2023 Minutes: The Chair welcomed everyone to the meeting. The Chair noted that the Members of the Scrutiny Committee had agreed to scrutinise the following items from the Cabinet Board agenda: · Item 7.
Amendment to Byelaw prohibiting cycling at Neath Memorial Gates and along the
path between the bottom pond and Cimla Crescent · Item 8. Public
Space Protection Orders - Aberavon Seafront · Item 9.
Replacement Local Development Plan (RLDP) - Revised Delivery Agreement (DA) · Item 10.
Parking Review 2023 |
|
Declarations of Interest Decision: There
were none. Minutes: There
were none. |
|
Pre-Decision Scrutiny To select appropriate items
from the Cabinet Board agenda for Pre-Decision Scrutiny (Cabinet Board reports
included for Scrutiny Members) Decision: Amendment
to Byelaw prohibiting cycling at Neath Memorial Gates and along the path
between the bottom pond and Cimla Crescent Following
scrutiny, members were supportive of the recommendations to be considered by
Cabinet Board. Public
Space Protection Orders - Aberavon Seafront Following
scrutiny, members were supportive of the recommendations to be considered by
Cabinet Board. Replacement
Local Development Plan (RLDP) - Revised Delivery Agreement (DA) Following
scrutiny, members were supportive of the recommendations to be considered by
Cabinet Board. Parking
Review 2023 Following
scrutiny, a recorded vote was proposed and seconded and agreed. The
recommendation as outlined on pages 206 - 209 of the Cabinet report was
proposed and seconded. For:
Cllrs T.Bowen, W.Carpenter,
R.Davies, N.Goldup-John. Against:
Cllrs S.Pursey, S.Freeguard,
S.Penry, C.James, S.Grimshaw, L.Williams. Members
were not supportive of the recommendations to be considered by Cabinet Board. Minutes: Amendment
to Byelaw prohibiting cycling at Neath Memorial Gates and along the path
between the bottom pond and Cimla Crescent Members
were concerned about the danger of any irresponsible cyclists cycling fast down
the hill through the gates. Members wanted to know if it was possible to open
the two side gates so they would have to unseat to pass. Members
questioned whether the gates would be open during important anniversaries of
remembrance such as battle of Britain or the armistice. Officers
advised that this was a procedural report to consult on the removal of the
prohibition of cycling. To comply with Active Travel guidelines, officers would
need to have the main gates open. Officers
advised they wouldn’t get support if cyclists had to dismount at the gates.
Officers advised that for remembrance services officers would suspend the order
and put in road closures to facilitate the events. If the gates were to remain
open, after the services, wreaths would be placed in a way that won’t cause an
obstruction to the cyclists. Members
wanted to keep in mind that it is a memorial and to keep people safe. Officers
advised that it may be possible for additional signage to be considered to make
people aware of the need to respect the memorials when cycling past and to be
careful. The
Chair felt that it was a good point about being respectful of the memorials and
to reflect that in the consultation members of the public would appreciate
that. Members
asked if there was a separate part of the path dedicated to cyclists. Officers
advised that the route is designed in principle, and officers will consult
further what the proposals will be. There may be parts that are a shared path,
and they may be able to achieve segregated cycling and walking paths in other
areas. This will be consulted at the detailed design stage. Officers
explained that this is only a small part of the Active Travel route. Members
asked how routes are identified and prioritised. Members didn’t think this was
an obvious priority in comparison to other routes elsewhere. Officers
advised that the adopted network route for the authority has identified 500
routes. There is no clear guidance now from Welsh Government or TFW on how to
prioritise these. There are currently, High, low and
medium priority routes. Officers are waiting on a software tool that is going
to help local authorities prioritise the schemes further. Officers
explained that they will then try to deliver these based on the re-assessed
prioritisation of routes with a view to secure grants to deliver those. Some
schemes will come forward at different stages as some routes may require the
purchase of land from private parties and there may also be consultation with
statutory consultees as well. Following
scrutiny, members were supportive of the recommendations to be considered by
Cabinet Board. Public
Space Protection Orders PSPO- Aberavon Seafront Officers
introduced the report as circulated to members. Members expressed support for renewing the ... view the full minutes text for item 3. |
|
Urgent Items Any
urgent items at the discretion of the Chairperson pursuant to Section 100BA(6)(b) of the Local Government Act 1972 (as amended). Decision: There
were none. Minutes: There
was none. |
|
Access to Meetings Access
to Meetings to resolve to exclude the public for the following item(s) pursuant
to Section 100A(4) and (5) of the Local Government Act
1972 and the relevant exempt paragraphs of Part 4 of Schedule 12A to the above
Act. Decision: Members
decided not to scrutinise any private items. Minutes: Members
decided not to scrutinise any private items. |
|
Pre-Decision Scrutiny of Private Item/s To
select appropriate private items from the Cabinet Board agenda for Pre-Decision
Scrutiny (Cabinet Board reports enclosed for Scrutiny Members). Decision: Members
decided not to scrutinise any private items. Minutes: Members
decided not to scrutinise any private items. |