Venue: Multi-Location Meeting - Council Chamber, Port Talbot & Microsoft Teams. View directions
Contact: Tom Rees Email: t.rees1@npt.gov.uk
No. | Item |
---|---|
Chair's Announcements Decision: The
Chair welcomed everyone to the meeting. Minutes: The
Chair welcomed everyone to the meeting. |
|
Declarations of Interest Decision: Declarations
of interest were received from - Cllr
N Goldup-John Item 3(a) Personal – works for Transport for Wales and a member
of NPT Links. Cllr
S Pursey Item 3(a) Personal – member of NPT Links. Minutes: Declarations
of interest were received from – Cllr
N Goldup-John Item 3(a) Personal – works for Transport for Wales and a member
of NPT Links. Cllr S Pursey Item 3(a) Personal – member of NPT Links. |
|
To Consider items from the Cabinet Forward Work Programme Decision: Members
considered items from the Cabinet Forward Work Programme. Minutes: Members
considered items from the Cabinet Forward Work Programme. |
|
Additional documents:
Decision: Following
scrutiny, members supported the recommendation outlined in the draft Cabinet
report. Minutes: The
chair welcomed a member of the public to the meeting and noted that person had
submitted a request to ask a question too late for the required timescales.
Democratic Services had offered them an opportunity to ask the question at the
cabinet meeting instead when this report is being considered. The chair advised
that the member of the public had accepted that option. The
chair gave members a background on the report and explained that it had
previously been due to be presented to the cabinet board and the scrutiny
committee in the previous civic year but there were concerns raised during a
chairs briefing around the report. The chair credited officers for taking on
board the concerns and officers had convened a meeting of cabinet members,
interested councillors and others, to discuss this matter. The chair noted that
as a result, the report is vastly improved from the original draft. Members
were unhappy that there are no timescales in the report and felt that to
measure the effectiveness of the strategy, time scales are required to see if
the authority is on track to achieve the targets. Members also wanted to see in
the report what grants the authority has previously applied for so that they
can compare and measure against those. Members
commented that there didn’t seem to be any measurable outcomes and asked that
more detail be included. Members
noted that the routes need maintenance and foliage cutting back to remain
accessible and they felt that the street scene budget and the highways budget
needs to be flexible and work together as it’s a job that crosses over both
departments. Members
were also concerned that the report date range was from 2024- 2029 but over
half of 2024 had already passed and felt that had meant most of this year had
been missed. The
Cabinet Member for Strategic Planning, Transport and Connectivity Cllr Wyndham
Griffiths gave a response to the questions and stated that the report does
cover 2024- 2029 and would have come earlier in the year but as the chair noted
earlier there had been another meeting with interested counsellors to expand on
what was wanted in the plan and that is why it's coming back to members now. The
Cabinet member advised that the delivery improvements are subject to grant
funding as the authority does not have an active travel budget and without the
certainty of funding, officers are uncomfortable setting exact timetables for
delivery. Members were advised that the authority had applied for £13 million
in grants and £152,000 of grant aid and of that they had received £6,000,573.
The cabinet member advised that the authority has got roughly half of all the
monies applied for. The
Cabinet member noted that there is no specific budget for maintenance and that
aside from the grant funding, the authority only gets the capital costs, but
any maintenance has got to come out of the Streetscene and council's budget. The Cabinet member advised that the ... view the full minutes text for item 3a |
|
To consider items from the Scrutiny Committee Work Programme. · No scrutiny committee Forward Work Programme items to be considered. Decision: There
were no items to consider from the scrutiny committee forward work programme. Minutes: The
Members of the Committee noted the Forward Work Programme. |
|
Performance Monitoring · No performance monitoring items to be considered. Decision: There
were no performance monitoring items for consideration. Minutes: There
were no performance monitoring items for consideration. |
|
Selection of Items for Future Scrutiny PDF 794 KB · Cabinet Forward Work Programme · Scrutiny Committee Forward Work
Programme Additional documents: Decision: Members
noted the Forward Work Programme. Minutes: Members
noted the Forward Work Programme. |
|
Urgent Items Any
urgent items at the discretion of the Chairperson pursuant to Section 100BA(6)(b) of the Local Government Act 1972 (as amended). Decision: There
were no urgent items. Minutes: There
was none. |