Venue: Council Chamber - Port Talbot Civic Centre. View directions
No. | Item | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Declarations of Interests Minutes:
|
|||||
Minutes of the previous meeting PDF 75 KB Additional documents: Minutes: Members
raised a query in relation to the Annual Governance Statement 2017/18 and
questioned whether the Corporate Risk Management Policy had been reported to
Audit Committee. Officers stated that the intention had been to report to
Cabinet first before reporting to Audit Committee, but there had been a delay
in the timescale. Officers explained that the policy would now go to Audit
Committee in July. Members
raised a query in relation to the Revenue Outturn and Reserves Position
Statement 2017/18, and questioned whether more information was available as
previously requested regarding school reserves as per point 3.4 on page nine.
Officers stated that the information would be reported to the next Education
Skills and Culture Scrutiny Committee. Officers added that the figures for the
surplus and reserves is readily available but a report would provide some
context. Members
requested an amendment to the attendance on the minutes, and for Cabinet Member
Councillor Peter Rees to be added as he was present at the meeting. Officers
requested an amendment on page 8 under the Annual Governance Statement 2017/18
in the last paragraph for information to be reported to Cabinet Board instead
of Audit Committee. Members
commented that at the last meeting it was agreed that all consultations should
be on the front page of the Authority’s web page, but this change had not taken
affect yet. The
Committee noted the minutes. |
|||||
To select appropriate items from the Cabinet agenda for pre-decision scrutiny (cabinet reports enclosed for Scrutiny Members) Minutes: 3.
PRE-SCRUTINY The Committee chose to
scrutinise the following items: Cabinet Board Papers 3.1 Swansea Bay City Deal The Committee received
information in relation to the Swansea Bay City Deal as contained within the circulated
report. Members welcomed the report
and thanked officers for their hard work. Members added that the deal was good
for the County Borough, particularly as the borrowing cost for the Authority
had been reduced from £21 million to £6.3 million. Members commented that
working on a regional basis would help create jobs within the County Borough.
Members referred to the section contained in the report regarding the Authority
being the main Scrutiny lead, and questioned whether the membership would mirror
that of the current Regeneration and Sustainable Development Scrutiny
Committee. Officers informed Members that the arrangements were not known at
this stage, and that the Assistant Chief Executive and Chief Digital Officer
and the Head of Legal Services were making enquiries into this. Officers added
that scrutiny arrangements were different across the four authorities,
therefore consideration would be required regarding the preferred model. Members queried whether there
was any flexibility in relation to the projects identified in the report and
whether they could be subject to change in the future. Officers confirmed that
projects could be changed as the framework made provision for this. Officers
stated that some projects could have stronger business cases than others, and
priorities could change in the future. Officers added that some projects were
also at a more advanced stage than others that were in their infancy. Members questioned whether
the Steel Science/National Innovation Centre project was in a strong position,
as this was an important initiative which would help support and sustain the
local steel industry. Officers stated that conversations were ongoing with
Swansea University where the project would be based on the Fabian Way campus.
Officers reported that the Leader had been in discussion with Ken Skates,
Assembly Member, regarding the matter. Officers informed Members that another
related project was being explored outside of the City Deal. Members stated that good
public relations and effective communication was essential to keep the public
updated on developments. Officers concurred, and stated that communication with
the public was a high priority. Officers added that the benefits of the City
Deal would be communicated widely. Members raised concerns that
the deteriorating local transport arrangements could exclude and isolate
citizens, and prevent them from receiving the benefits of the City Deal.
Members added that many transport providers were withdrawing their local services.
Officers stated that transport issues were not being addressed under the remit
of the City Deal; however officers agreed that a transport project should be
undertaken separately to underpin the deal, with strong governance arrangements
established. Officers informed Members that this issue was widely acknowledged
by all partners. Officers added that the Authority were undertaking various
pieces of work to address the issues being encountered within the county
borough. Members queried whether it was proposed to combine the Scrutiny and Audit ... view the full minutes text for item 3. |
|||||
Forward Work Programme 18/19 PDF 34 KB Minutes: The
Committee noted the Forward Work Programme. |