Venue: Multi-location - Microsoft Teams and Cabinet Conference Room
Contact: Alison Thomas Email: a.thomas6@npt.gov.uk
No. | Item |
---|---|
Chairs Announcements Decision: The
Chair welcomed everyone to the meeting. Minutes: The
Chair welcomed everyone to the meeting. |
|
Declarations of Interests Decision: There
were no declarations of interest received. Minutes: There
were no declarations of interest received. |
|
Minutes of the Previous Meeting PDF 469 KB ·
14 February 2024 ·
28 February 2024 Additional documents: Decision: The
minutes of the meetings held on 14 February and 28 February were approved as a
true and accurate record. Minutes: The
minutes of the meetings held on 14 February and 28 February were approved as a
true and accurate record. |
|
Pre-decision Scrutiny ·
To select appropriate items from the Cabinet agenda for pre-decision
scrutiny (cabinet reports enclosed for Scrutiny Members) Decision: Audit
Wales - Service User Perspective Members
considered the report as circulated within the Cabinet agenda. Following
scrutiny, the recommendation was supported to Cabinet. Minutes: Audit
Wales - Service User Perspective Members
considered the report as circulated within the Cabinet agenda. Officers
outlined the remit of the report. They advised members that whilst they were
not fully in agreement with the recommendations outlined in the report from
Audit Wales, officers acknowledge that there is further work to be done. The
Organisational Response Form provides a succinct response to the
recommendations from Audit Wales and it has been accepted by them. In
terms of user feedback, there are a number of examples of where user feedback
is collected across the authority. Officers provided examples of where this is
done. Examples included a report from Social Services on Housing and Community
Safety. This was the annual report on participating and includes engaging with
service users to determine what is important to them. Officers referred to The
Children and Young People’s Plan where there was a consultation carried out and
a number of feedback obtained. Information is also collected via the
Compliments and Complaints Procedure and this is collated and analysed to look
for improvements that can be made to the service. It was also acknowledged that
a similar process is used by the Customer Services Team. Officers outlined that
they are working with Audit Wales to ensure that the information collected is
robust and doesn’t cause extra work for officers in collating the information. Members
queried which parts of the recommendations from Audit Wales are not accepted by
officers. Officers outlined that the work carried out by Audit Wales was very
narrow and was part of a national piece of work that was carried out. Officers
accepted that the authority does collect a lot of service user perspective
data, however further work was required strengthening how this data is collated
and used. Members
noted that in some areas, the authority was not perhaps understanding the
service user perspective when making decisions. Members
referred to the two recommendations in the report. Members
considered the two actions identified in R1as quite sensible R1 two actions as
quite sensible, however suggested that there might be some more work to be done
to make sure senior leaders understand the value of having the data and what it
is for. Members recognised that the authority need to understand why the
service data is important and how it can be used to improve the service. Some
services are people centric and members considered these areas to use service
user data perspective well. However suggested that where the service was not
people centric, then the authority tended to focus on targets as opposed to the
service user perspective. In terms of the quality and accuracy of the data outlined in R3, members referred to the response that there would be an engagement with the internal audit about checking information quality and accuracy of information and queried if the authority needed an action further back to make sure data is being gathered correctly at the first point? Is there further work required to upskill workers ... view the full minutes text for item 4. |
|
Forward Work Programme 2023/24 PDF 391 KB Decision: The
Forward Work Programme was noted. Minutes: The
Forward Work Programme was noted. |
|
Urgent Items Any
urgent items at the discretion of the Chairperson pursuant to Section 100BA(6)(b) of the Local Government Act 1972 (as amended). Decision: There
were no urgent items. Minutes: There
were no urgent items. |
|
Access to Meetings To
resolve to exclude the public for the following
item(s)
pursuant to Section 100A(4) and (5) of the Local
Government Act
1972 and the relevant exempt paragraphs of Part
4 of Schedule
12A to the above Act. Decision: Resolved: to exclude the public for
the following item(s) pursuant to Section 100A(4) and (5) of the Local
Government Act 1972 and the relevant exempt paragraphs of Part 4 of Schedule
12A to the above Act. Minutes: Resolved: to exclude the public for
the following item(s) pursuant to Section 100A(4) and (5) of the Local
Government Act 1972 and the relevant exempt paragraphs of Part 4 of Schedule
12A to the above Act. |
|
Pre-Decision Scrutiny of Private Item/s ·
To select appropriate private items from the Cabinet agenda for
pre-decision scrutiny (cabinet reports enclosed for Scrutiny Members) Decision: Members
considered the report as circulated within the agenda pack. Following
scrutiny, the amended recommendations were supported to Cabinet. Minutes: Swansea Bay City Deal
Homes as Power Stations Subsidy Scheme Members
considered the report as circulated within the agenda pack. Following
scrutiny, the amended recommendations were supported to Cabinet. |