Venue: Committee Rooms A/B - Neath Civic Centre. View directions
No. | Item |
---|---|
To receive any declarations of interest from Members Minutes: The
following Members made Declarations of Interest at the commencement of the
meeting: Cllr. Leanne Jones – The report of the Head of Planning and Public
Protection on Environmental Health and Trading Standards Business Advice,
because family members are employed in the Environmental Health and Trading
Standards section. Cllr.
Saifur Rahaman - The report of the Head of Planning and Public Protection on
Environmental Health and Trading Standards Business Advice, and the report of
the Head of Property and Regeneration on Aberavon Seafront Regeneration Update,
because family members run a catering business on the Aberavon Seafront. Cllr. Rachel Taylor – The report of the Head of Property and
Regeneration on the Property Performance Report, because she is a trustee of Taibach Library. Cllr. Sean Pursey – The report of the Head of Property and Regeneration
on the Property Performance Report, because he is a trustee of Taibach Library and a member of the Plaza Community Group. |
|
Minutes: Members
noted the minutes from the previous meeting. |
|
To receive the Scrutiny Forward Work Programme 2017/18. PDF 74 KB Minutes: Members noted
the scrutiny forward programme for 2017/18. |
|
To select appropriate items from the Cabinet Board Agenda for pre-scrutiny (Cabinet Board reports enclosed for Scrutiny Members). Minutes:
4.
PRE-SCRUTINY The Committee chose to scrutinise the
following items:
4.1 2 x Supplementary Planning Guidance The Committee received information in relation
to the 2 x Supplementary Planning Guidance (SPG) as contained within the
circulated report. Members raised concerns that the Compensation Scheme set out in the
Biodiversity and Geodiversity SPG made the planning
process potentially more bureaucratic and less democratic, limiting the input
from local Members and communities. Officers informed Members that the purpose
of the Local Development Plan (LDP) policy was to protect important habitats,
species and sites of geological interest from the adverse impacts of
developments. Officers explained that where harm was unavoidable, effective
on-site mitigation measures would be required and only as a last resort, where
mitigation was not possible, would off-site compensation be considered.
Officers stated that given it was difficult for some developers to find
additional land for off-site compensation and that many developers would rather
pay the Council for compensation to be addressed, the scheme sought to set out
the steps that the Council can take to provide a workable compensation service. Members queried whether there was a comprehensive list of ‘Sites of
Interest for Nature Conservation’ (SINCs) in the county borough. Officers
stated that the process of identifying SINCs was ongoing. Officers added that
the areas which were likely to generate interest from developers had already
been looked at, but the more remote areas were still being assessed. Members queried whether designated sites (e.g. Sites of Special
Scientific Interest) would remain protected under the SPGs. Officers stated
that designated sites of European and national importance are already protected
by legislation and national policy, whereas the LDP policy and SPGs related
more to protecting sites of local interest. Members queried the extent of the ‘undeveloped coast’ designation set
out in the Landscape and Seascape SPG, as it appeared to include an area of the
former BP site. Officers confirmed that this was a drafting error and that the
LDP designation did not include land that was formerly part of the BP site. The
error would be addressed prior to consultation. Members questioned if it was
possible to extend the undeveloped coast designation. Officers stated that
whilst it was not possible at this stage, all policies would be reconsidered
when the review of the LDP commences in 2020. Members referred to the ‘green wedge’ designations and queried whether
they would still be subject to the same protection once the current LDP had
expired. Officers stated that the relevance and extent of the green wedge
designations would be considered in all future reviews of the LDP which would
take place every four years. Following scrutiny the Committee were
supportive of the proposals to be considered at Cabinet Board.
The Committee received information in
relation to the Environmental Health and Trading Standards Business Advice as
contained within the circulated report. Members queried how much income would the charge for business advice be likely ... view the full minutes text for item 4. |