4 Changes in Access Approach to Parks and Gardens PDF 215 KB
Additional documents:
Decision:
Following
scrutiny, the recommendation was supported to Cabinet.
Minutes:
James
M. Davies, Neighbourhood Services Manager explained that this report follows up
on the initial report from late 2024, which initiated a four-month trial
period. Members were advised that the report presents feedback from
stakeholders, staff, and community safety partnership meetings held at the
start and end of the trial. Members were advised that the next step is to
proceed with a full consultation process, expected to last 6 to 8 weeks,
starting in a few weeks.
The
chair thanked officers and cabinet members for considering the feedback from
the first report. He noted that members had suggested including a consultation
process during the trial but agreed that conducting a proper consultation now
is a better option. He felt members appreciated this approach.
Members
asked if the cost of repairing damage to parks would outweigh the savings from
locking them? If parks are being damaged, is locking them the best solution?
Officers
clarified that the initiative wasn't intended as a cost-saving measure, despite
identifying a £5000 saving. The main reason for the initiative was the frequent
failure of lock-in operations due to the nature of the role and difficulties
encountered with people staying in the parks overnight. This prompted the
consideration of the initiative.
Officers
advised that they received feedback indicating that locking the parks wasn't
beneficial. Officers plan to address issues in parks by implementing mitigation
measures rather than locking gates. This will allow officers to reallocate
resources to improve playground maintenance and inspections during regular
working hours. Any savings could be offset by the cost of additional measures
like bollards.
Members
inquired whether reassigning mobile rangers to play areas represents a
reduction in staff. They also asked if, in case of vandalism issues would there
be other personnel available to lock gates if the mobile ranger positions are
eliminated.
Officers
clarified that there is no reduction in staff. The goal is to reallocate
resources to improve playground inspections and maintenance, providing better
value for money. The mobile ranger is not currently on call to handle vandalism
or similar issues, and this will not change if the decision is made permanent
following the consultation.
Members
were advised that supervisors manage the different zones across the borough,
and this will continue. There is also an on-call rota to address safety issues
during weekends and evenings.
Members
asked if there will still be personnel available to lock parks in the future if
needed.
Officers
explained that they need to understand the necessity of locking parks. During
the four-month trial, over 50% of feedback concerned Victoria Gardens, which
has unique challenges due to its proximity to the town centre and evening
activities. The police noted an impact when gates were previously installed.
Unlike most parks, Victoria Gardens is manned during the day.
Members were advised that currently, there is no impact on staffing as staff are already working during the gate closing hours. The consultation may lead to a recommendation to exclude Victoria Gardens from the initiative due to its unique circumstances. ... view the full minutes text for item 4