3 Arboriculture Management Plan PDF 213 KB
Additional documents:
Decision:
Following scrutiny, members supported the recommendation outlined in the draft Cabinet report.
Minutes:
3(b) Arboriculture Management
Plan
Officers advised that
the report is part of a service review that officers have undertaken, and they have
identified a need to formalise a tree inspection plan. Officers have
amalgamated that new document with the existing Arboriculture management plan
which went through in 2021.
Members asked how secure
is the budget for this plan in terms of funding?
Officers advised that as
part of the establishment change there are now 6 operational staff, one tree
inspector and 1 arboriculture management officer. Officers explained that when
it comes to Arboriculture management, the issue is the initial inspection
that's required to get the authority into a position where it is in line with
the tree inspection policy.
There are some capital
monies available that officers can utilise for that. Once they get to that
position, the inspection programme will be a three and a five-year cyclical
programme which officers will be able to run with the resources they currently
have.
The issue around the
resources is when it comes to any works that can identify through those
inspections that are required, they will need some capital investment, this
means that as long as nothing further is cut then then
it's OK.
Officers also advised
that the initial money is secure and officers will be
bringing a further report back to members. If there is a question of public
safety, officers would have to reprioritise some capital for that.
The chair noted that
once that initial survey is done officers will have a better understanding of
the state of all the green infrastructure. Members felt this was positive as it
is an investment in understanding of all those risks and how to manage them.
The director advised
that most years officers bring forward reports to corporate directors’ group
with in-year pressures that the individual directorates are experiencing and
explained that for multiple years, officers brought forward a pressure relating
to Ash die back and they were allocated additional money to deal with that
issue. Officers explained that if something occurred which hadn't been factored
in, they could identify it as an in-year pressure. That doesn't necessarily
mean it will get supported, but it is an avenue available to them.
Following scrutiny,
members supported the recommendation outlined in the draft Cabinet report.